My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 10:32:41 AM
Creation date
6/25/2024 10:24:37 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22. 1991 <br />#1604 CLAIR ROOD <br />2215 KENWOOD WAY <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />^^rtM*PTNTlATION OP PUBLIC HEARINGCONTINUATION^ was present, as was Mrs. Lorraine Moss, a nexcnoor <br />interested in this application. <br />Kelley re-opened the Public Hearing at 5:15 p.-Ti. and asked <br />Gaffron to briefiy review Mr. Rood's proposa-. <br />Gaffron stated that Mr. Rood had revised his P^°P°sal since <br />Sold is the pond only five feen in depth. <br />12 feet.The boundaries of the pond have not <br />ehanaed but the slopes are now shown at a four to one ratio, as changed, bu P still requesting approval i.o <br />c^nve^. approximately ‘one-third of the wetlands <br />is also proposing to fill and excavate portions of the <br />^ 1 % » riff ran showed the Planning Commission where the <br />would b^d^posited and stated thal it would be necessary <br />spoils woul P^^ provide silt fencing and erosion control <br />meLures. ‘ e reviewed^ the additions^! issues involved with this <br />application as noted in his January 17. 199 memo. <br />Cohen asked if the monuments were still an issue. <br />Gaffron replied. "The monuments may b= a separate issue, <br />-he.e is an unlevtloped public rig.ht-of-way to the rear and side <br />o*f the property. Is this property considered a through <br />corner lot?Would <br />abuHInra^r^ght"^^^^^^^^should they be more than 3.5 ^igh? <br />If thev^ are L accessory structure, should they meet a 10 foot <br />Setback. If tSay can exist at all in a side yard or rear yard <br />without a Conditional Use Permit. There are many issues. <br />Rowlette asked whether Mr. Rood had a specific reason, other <br />than aesthetics, for altering the wetland. <br />Gaffron stated that the applicant's ma:or intent is to clean <br />_ the wetlands which have been used as a dumping ground <br />iLra ni said, "Mr. Rood also wants to aestheticaiiy improve <br />^he Appearance of the wetland in addition to c.reating some <br />different characteristics for wildlife. <br />Mr Rood seated that ha has not seen a great deal cf <br />wildlife in t.he'wetland.He said. "I t.hought i.'' I provided <br />additional area of open water, it may enhance the * <br />would like to install some wood duck houses ^roy <br />tSi ducks must land in water. It is not my intention to destroy <br />the wildlife."
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.