Laserfiche WebLink
tile City's standpoint should he ununce r zH \^Trr <br />iTiacinas in the future. Again r cnis can oe aone oy one or <br />three methods outlined iccvt. <br />t he <br />Issue #5 - Lake Use Committee Comoosition - If the Lake Use <br />Committ^ Is to continue its composition may depend on the tasks <br />it undertakes. A possible composition of the group could be as <br />follows: <br />2 to 3 Councilmember3 <br />2 to 3 Planning Commission members <br />City’s LMCD Representative <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />Issue #1 - LMCD Information <br />1. Accept. <br />2. Discuss <br />3. Table for further information <br />Issue #2 - Shoreland Regulations <br />1. Accept the information. <br />2. Select working group. <br />3. Table for further discussion. <br />Issue,#3 - Marina Licensing <br />A. In House Development <br />1. Accept the information. <br />2. Select working group cr direction for that. <br />3. Table for further discussion. <br />B. DNR Review Process <br />1. Accept. <br />2. Confirm/Revise intended review process. <br />3. Table. <br />Issue »4 - Marina Long Term Direction <br />1. Accept the inforaation. <br />2. Leave current process in place. <br />3. Select group to study issue. <br />4. Table for further discussion. <br />Issue #5 - Lake Use Committee Composition <br />1. Leave as is. <br />2. Not utilize lake use format for any other tasks than <br />LMCD Comprehensive Plan. <br />3. Select a new composition. <br />4. Table for further discussion.