My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
05-28-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2024 2:10:25 PM
Creation date
6/14/2024 2:06:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
marine licensing and site visits together with shoreland regulations <br />and alternatives. The question at this juncture, as noted on the <br />schedule, is the next step to review options and alternatives. <br />Originally it had been suggested by the schedule that there be a <br />joint Council/Planning Commission workshop on this issue. This can <br />still be held but once that happens one of three ootions exist: <br />1. Have Planning Commission or Subcommittee of the <br />Planning Commission work on it. <br />2. Have the Lake Use Committee do the work on it. <br />3. Arrange a special Task Force of Counci 1/P lanning <br />Commission and/or other interested parties. <br />B* Process With DNR - At this juncture the City which has applied <br />for a separate grant has 3 options regarding review of its shoreland <br />regulations with DNR: <br />1. Continue with a separate review with DNR contingent <br />on receiving a grant separately from DNR. Up to <br />$5,000 on a matching basis, (i.e. They will pay half <br />the costs up to $5,000.) <br />2. Continuing separately regardless of whether City <br />-eceives DNR grant or not. <br />3. Do the review under a cooperative arrangement with <br />the other 13 LMCD cities for the lake participating <br />in a technical review committee prior to initiation <br />of the formal review process. As presently proposed <br />LMCp would be the conduit for funding, handle <br />administrative issues of setting meeting, notices <br />etc. and also participate as a member of the <br />committee in a capacity similar to a city. <br />(Previously they were the "convenor" and where to be <br />the Chair of the committee.) <br />Issue £3 - Marina Licensing - As noted above Mike Gaffron has <br />been preparing to do site visits and is expected to have those <br />done June 1. The next step then would be to develop <br />recommendations and have those recommendations reviewed by one of <br />the following: <br />A. Council <br />B. Planning Commission <br />C. Lake Use Committee <br />D. Marina Committee <br />Any land use issues regardless of the format will necessarily <br />have to be reviewed through a normal land use/variance process in <br />order to have made legal. <br />Issue ♦4 — Long Term Marina Regu1ation ~ This is a separate issue <br />from licensing to determine what the most appropriate method from
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.