My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
05-28-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2024 2:10:25 PM
Creation date
6/14/2024 2:06:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
* <br />Prr4iMh. <br />.’!ayor ana -i-y counc:. <br />FROM: Mar'< E. 3ernhardson, ? <br />DATE: May 2, 1991 <br />SUBJECT: Lake Use Committee <br />Attachment:A. City of Wayzata Memo Dated 5.'2/91 <br />3. Shoreline Memo Dated 2/12/91/Sxcerpt - <br />Attachment C <br />C. Lake Use Management Dated 4/7/90 (no attachments) <br />D. City of Orono Letter Dated 4 :5/?i <br />E. City of Wayzata Summary Dated 4/26/91 <br />F. DNR Letter Dated 4/30/91 <br />G. Metro Council Letter Dated 5,'2,'91 <br />ISSUE - <br />Provide the Council an update on lake use related activities: <br />1. LMCD Comprehensive Management Plan <br />2. Shoreland Regulations progress <br />3. 1991 Marina licensing <br />4. Long Term marina regulation <br />5. Lake Use Committee Composition <br />INTRODUCTION - Last year, as noted in Attachment C the City <br />appointed" a Lake Use Committee to address primarily the LMCD <br />Comprehensive Plan but it was able to be used for other means> The <br />work on Comprehensive Plan has obviously taken longer than anyone <br />would have anticipated at the time, but the work par t icu lar i 1 y by <br />CounciImembers Jabbour and Callahan have resulted in what is <br />anticipated to be a reworked LMCD plan. <br />DISCUSSION - <br />Issue »1 - LMCD Comprehensive Management Plan - The draft that <br />had been presented to Council last time has now been distributed <br />to the 14 communities noted in Attachment D. Additionally, <br />Wayzata's consultant planner undertook a summary of that, as noted <br />in Attachment E. Subsequent to the last meeting DNR received an <br />"unofficial" Attorneys General opinion (Attachment F) that related <br />to what was meant in the DNR regulations as far as "must be <br />approved" and as to whether that constituted a veto authority. As <br />noted in the opinion, because contested court cases are allowed for <br />both those proposing and those affected by that control, it was the <br />opinion of the Attorneys General Special Assistant that therefore <br />there was not "absolute veto". The group is now scheduled to again <br />meet on 5/29/91. <br />Issue #2 - Shoreland Regulations - <br />A. Internal Development Process - Now that the Comprehensive Plan #3 <br />information has been completed, Michael Gaffron is working on both
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.