11-09-1998 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. * Kelly Cove Joint Dock Novembers, 19^8 Page 2 1, Owhl? ol Lot 3, Navarre Cove (Ho>1) must agree via covenant to a limit of two boats for a single family residence on Lot 3, and formally give up the rights to have a duplex on the property. Outlot A, Navarre Cove and Lot 3 must then be legally combined, and KCHA's interests in Outlot A and Lot 3 must be extinguished. 2.KCHA must agree via covenant to limit the new docks to no more than 4 slips of a size (width and length) no greater than the existing slips, and in a compact and defined location and configuration. 3.Staff to notify neighborhood for a public hearing. July 27 Council Action On July 27 Council held a public hearing at which a number of interests were heard from. Rick Sheridan represented Brad Hoyt. John Kupfer represented the Kelly Cove homeowners. Richard Edwards spoke on behalf of a group of 6 property owners surrounding the lagoon, who requested that the proposed dock be moved further east along the lagoon and closer to shore, which appeared acceptable to the Kelly Cove group. Please refer to the minutes of July 27 for more detail of the various topics discussed. Council again confirmed that it is the Council's intent to limit Kelly Cove.'Navarre Cove properties to a total of 6 slips, i.e. I slip for each of the 4 remaining duplexes, and 2 slips for the Hoyt property regardless whether it becomes a single family home or a duplex. After discussion regarding the 60-day window for City action on this request. Council voted 4*I to deny the request but allow the Kelly Cove homeowners to re-apply at no charge if Mr. Hoyt reaches a conclusion on how he will develop his property. Current Status of Proposal Austin Evans on behalf of the KCHA has submitted a dock plan with the following parameters: -Location centered approximately 20' east from the original proposal, in the same general configuration Total length from shore reduced from 56' to 48' Indl' idual slips have not changed from the initial proposal of 13' x 32’ Rick Sheridan on behalf of Brad Hoyt has made the follow ing points in his letter: His analysis of the background on how ’ the current dock system came about, is that the issue was totally driven by presersation of wetlands. Since the wetlands in question no longer exist, the reason for the common dock scheme is no longer present. -The documents creating the current dock scheme appai ently were not recorded Kells