My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:59:00 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:53:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Zoning File #2339 <br />March 4,1998 <br />Page 5 <br />3.Applicant to constmct a 28' paved roadway with a temporary 80’ diameter cul-de-sac located <br />approximately between Lots 1 and 2. based on fire department needs and code standards. <br />Note that if this was being proposed as a 2-lot plat, the need to provide a corridor for future <br />through road would still exist, but code would not require the establishment of a road and <br />cul-de-sac at this time, since the threshold for full road status is 3 or more lots. <br />4.No variances should be granted for lot area, lot width, setbacks, or hardcover (except that <br />staff reluctantly recommends approval of the allowance of 17 of hardcover credit for each <br />lot - this reluctance is due to the possible precedent-setting aspect as well as having to <br />administer this site somewhat differently than all others in regards to hardcover). The <br />hardcover associated with the cul-de-sac would not count against the hardcover allotment <br />for the respective lots, if Council so chooses. <br />5.If a temporary cul-de-sac is required, it sh juld be on a separate easement which could be <br />separately vacated in the future. <br />6.The applicant should address all grading and drainage issues, and develop a plan for a water <br />quality pond on the site per the Engineer's recommendation. <br />7. <br />8. <br />9. <br />The standard park dedication fee should be required. <br />The standard drainage and utility easements should be required. <br />Extension of the 60-day statutor>' review period to 60 days (to 5/23/98). <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Provide applicant conceptual direction regarding the road, hardcover and stormwater issues. Based <br />on such direction, direct applicant to provide additional information, plan revisions, grading and <br />stormwater plans, etc. as necessary and direct staff to prepare a resolution for preliminary plat <br />approval for adoption at a future Council meeting. <br />■ ifVi
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.