My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:59:00 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:53:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Zoning File #2339 <br />March 4, 1998 <br />Page 4 <br />General Subdivision Comments <br />1. <br />2. <br />Park dedication. This property does not abut any proposed City or County proposed trail <br />system. The Park Commission has recommended payment of a park dedication fee. <br />Access Location . Hennepin County Department of Public Works has indicated the proposed <br />entrance location on Tonkavva is acceptable, and no additional right-of-way is needed. <br />3. Floodplain . Applicant’s surveyor has confirmed that the property is almost entirely above <br />floodplain elevation except for a portion of the ditch along Tonkawa Road. No filling of the <br />floodplain in conjunction with this project is anticipated. <br />Issues for Discussion <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Does Council agree with the staff and Planning Commission's recommendations that a future <br />through road connection to Birch Lane be provided for at this time? <br />Does Council agree with Planning Commission's recommendations regarding construction <br />of a 28' paved private road with T turnaround? Or, should a cul-de-sac be required per <br />staffs recommendation? <br />Does Council toncui ih the Planning Commission recommendation to grant 17' of <br />hardcover credit to each lot based on the right-of-way dedication? <br />Does Council concur that a water quality pond should be required for this site? What is the <br />impact of such pond op lot areas? <br />5. Does Council have any other comments or concerns regarding this plat proposal? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends conceptual preliminary plat approval, as follows: <br />1.Platting of a private road outlot along the entire length of the south boundary. The outlot can <br />be 42' in width if it can be confirmed by the City Attorney that the City has roadway rights <br />over the 8' adjacent easement. <br />2. Applicant to grant City an underlying Road and futilities Easement tor the road outlot,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.