My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCl <br />MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 26,1998 <br />Flmt moved, to reconsider the application. The motion failed for lack of a second to the <br />rMondderi''' disrespectful and not reasonable in failing to <br />“IT’’''"""' •“ <br />previously for variance approval was <br />paswd after difficult discussion on the issue. He expressed his thought process'^regardine <br />rJ’H Jabbour felt the beach users should not have to go all the way to the <br />residence in order to obtain equipment for the beach. He did not view the structure as <br />being storage or a location for trailers. He feels a 12'xl5’ structure is adequate for beach <br />wasgivt^dufcoSr''leant <br />Brooks said he felt too many issues were before the Council for discussion when the <br />vanance approval was granted and late on the agenda. Jabbour noted that the issue was <br />the first for review at this meeting. <br />wasGaffi-on indicated the applicant can reapply in 6 months. Brooks said he <br />disappointed in the Council's decision not to reconsider the application. Gaflfron clarified <br />that since the application itself was approved in October, it would not require a 6 month <br />wait but another application could be submitted by Brooks. <br />Brooks noted new information was submitted. Jabbour acknowledged receipt of the <br />information. He asked Brooks if the facts fairly represent his view. Brooks said they did. <br />(#4) #2308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELLNE DRIVE - PRD & CLASS <br />HI PRELIMINARY SUBDIMSION <br />Bill Gleason represented Brook Park Realty. <br />Van Zomeren distributed pictures of the property and reviewed the proposal. The 9.93 <br />acre parcel is located in the LR-IC-1 Zoning District and includes 2.2 acres of wetlands <br />and 7.7 acres of dry buildable. The proposal is for 30 townhome units requiring a Class <br />III Subdivision and PRD approval. The density allowed for this property is 2 units per <br />acre. The applicant is requesting a density credit to allow 3 units per acre. <br />Van Zomeren reviewed the purpose of the PRD, #1 through #5, as noted in the <br />information packet. She explained the PRD, noting variances to subdivision requirements <br />can be allowed if the goals of the PRD are met. There were outstanding issues when the <br />application was last discussed and are listed in the packet as "a-l" on page 2 and forward. <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.