My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />meeting held on JANUARY 26, 1998 <br />" >^2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) <br />proposed that shifts four easteriy units to the nmth^ hammerhead, a cul-de-sac is <br />some trees including 34" and 24^ oaks Van 7n^^' requires removal of <br />direction on the cul de-sac or hammeL^'" Zomeren said the appUcant is asking for <br />from the property line and is being proposed at'sO' The an’f <br />to the subdivision requirements. ^ applicant is asking for a change <br />Density was previously discussed. Van Zomeren referenced a letter from Cilv Attomev <br />Barrett regard.ng this issue. With the PRD. there should be no need for aSe oS <br />acrTs wh^no we".landT" ^ ^ <br />Van Zonieren reviewed sprinklers versus looping. It was indicated that water pressure is <br />ot the issue but capacity is a concern. Looping destroys more trees. <br />There are two plans proposed for road width; a 22' private drive with hammerhead ora <br />pnvate dnve with cul-de-sac. The subdivision ordinance does not recognize right-of- <br />\w^y or nunimum paved road width standards for tovvnhome developments. <br />Van Zomeren noted City's concern with the design of the individual units. Guests would <br />have to enter the units through the garage or walk around to the courtyard side for entry. <br />1 he City s consultant planner expressed concern with the functionality of the units, <br />including the inability for a temporarily disabled person to climb the deck stairs. The <br />maintenance concern for the deck and staircase, especially during the winter months, was <br />noted. The narrowness of the garage for additional storage i.s also a concern. <br />development. The question has been raised regarding <br />the fieed for gaming permission from other residents for guest parking if parking needs <br />excee that allowed in the driveway. No parking is allowed on the private roads.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.