Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC COMMENTS ------- <br />is installing rip rap on feTtofeUne a^dTsVfh’””*'*''' °" *“'*’*’* Casey <br />approval of the Watershed Distdct HesZtlZZJ f ^ <br />penmt m order to move 2 cubic yards of dirt at ''' "aaded a conditional use <br />hired, and the need to go through the Cim^ ^ iakeshore. The contractors have been <br />for approval now to move the dirt an^oMaii;rar.:'h:t‘t <br />™T“ri"S ^htfploc^^^^ f°a riprapping; yet he finds it hard to believe <br />pernuts .e not required, the Council sho^d^tr^^ grsuct^'rll:! ^'^g <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />mS f ZST s?dS.on - <br />Conley Brooks was present. <br />given October 13 fo1'a'^or11gTgaraye'''Th^^^^ reconsideration of a variance approval <br />The 12'x 15' garage received fpprovfl for^ocf3"1b- °n'“f‘‘ *^®ed, <br />limited to I2'xl5'. The reside^L is lorataHB l!k fer<i. but was <br />the 26' wetland setback and be located ™e« <br />proposed a 24’x24’ garace and thp PI applicant originally <br />18'x24' garage. The^apDlicaml Commission recommended approval of a <br />structure was provided. '^S approval of a 16'x22'garage. A diagram of the <br />Gaffron said the applicant believes a l^’vi ♦ <br />indicated it would require a 4/5th vniP • ^ be functional. He <br />Barrett said the Council - ''®<^o"sideration of the anniin,M«e,-a., til adiu me t^ouncil can discuss the mentc ration of the application, <br />the application back to the Planning Commission^^^ <br />initiaUcdoMs^equ^^ member, who voted with the <br />•on, is required to open the application for reconsideration.majority on the