Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9,1998 <br />(#10 - #2339 James Render - Continued) <br />Mr. Carlson asked if the Council can add language stipulating that the road will not go <br />through in the future. Jabbour informed him that this Council cannot bind future <br />Councils but indicated that the minutes will reflect the Council's desires. <br />Mrs. Robertson asked if all of the neighbors were contacted regarding the application. <br />Jabbour said any review of the road will not occur without the neighbors being contacted, <br />Mr. Regan asked about the pond. He was informed that the pond acreage will not count <br />against the hardcover but only applies to the one lot unless the pond is built as part of <br />two lots. Gronberg noted that the pond is bigger due to the runoff from Tonkawa. <br />Gaffron recommended the application be tabled for preliminary plat review noting the <br />conceptual direction given. <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to table Application #2339. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(A short recess was held.) <br />(#4) #2317 KHASROW DAIVARI, 1082 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - AFTER-THE- <br />FACT VARIANCES <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to obtain an e.xtension of the time period for review <br />of the application. If the extension is not granted by the applicant by the end of the <br />business day on March 11, 1998, the application will be denied V'ote Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Staff was asked to explain to the applicant that State Statute mandates the extension be <br />provided <br />(#11) #2341 DANIEL J. ANDERSON, 905 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Gaffron reported that the application is for preliminar>’ plat approval of the 17.5 acre <br />Carpenter property. The sketch plan included 8 lots. The plan has since been revised to <br />7 lots. The property is located outside of the MUSA boundary and will require septic <br />and well. A 700' road with cul-de-sac is being proposed. <br />Gaffron reviewed the house locations. The 7 lots will be served by a private road. The <br />7th lot w ill have a driveway that is an extension of the private road This ha., been <br />approved by the County. The existing residence on Lot 1 wi!> remain and will meet all <br />setbacks. Lots 1 and 2 are technically through lots Lot widtn variances are required for <br />Lots 2 and 3 as they do not meet the 200* width requirement at the 50' setback.