My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9, 1998 <br />(#10 - #2339 James Render - Continued) <br />Jabbour reiterated that the plan should include a 25' easement for a total of 33'. There <br />would be no hardcover credit for the road, and the applicant would have 16' for a <br />driveway. A hammerhead style turnaround would be acceptable with parking at the end <br />of it. Kelley said he would not support any proposal without a cul-de-sac and 28' road. <br />Peterson asked what size cul-de-sac would be required. Gaffron said it would normally <br />require an 80' paved surface to provide the necessary benefits. <br />Jabbour suggested all properties likely would be served from Tonkawa for fire <br />emergencies and the hammerhead would provide the needed parking space for the <br />residences. <br />Jabbour reiterated the outlot would be 25' plus 8' for a total of 33' for the easement. The <br />road would be 16' wide with a hammerhead. No variances would be allowed for lot area, <br />lot width, setback, or hardcover. Jabbour questioned whether credit would be given in <br />area for the ponding. Gaffron indicated that the pond area could be credited towards <br />hardcover in the 75 -250 setback The credit would not be for lot area, which has been <br />done in sewered areas only with wetlands Gaffron indicated that the pond would only <br />afiect the one lot in which it will be placed. Gronberg noted that the attempt was to <br />accommodate the neighborhood drainage but suggested the pond may be built to only <br />treat these 3 lots. <br />Gaffron indicated that the City Attorney has suggested if there was any variances that a <br />60-day e.xtension be requested after the initial 60-day period Jabbour asked if any <br />variances were anticipated. Gaftron said a road width variance would be necessary. <br />Render was asked for approval of the 60 day extension Render asked if all of the 60 <br />days were necessary. He was informed that it would probably not take the entire time <br />period. Render indicated the property is to close on May 1 but w'ould give approval for <br />the extension. Barrett indicated that consent is only necessary when the City goes <br />beyond the 60 day time period. <br />Kelley asked for clarification on the road easements. He was informed that there was 8' <br />on the south side as part of the 33'. With the additional 17' to the 8' on both sides, the <br />total would be jj'. Jabbour said the 8' easement requires verification. <br />Kelley suggested that It be stipulated in the resolution that no hardcover variance would <br />be allowed. Gaftron said a statement of intent could be included. Kelley asked that this <br />be done. Jabbour agreed that the City should take a more aggressive stand on this issue <br />Harold Gillette, 3470 North Shore Drive, said he has lived in the neighborhood for 50 <br />years. He voiced concern for the children if the road were to go through to Tonkawa <br />Jabbour informed him that this Council felt strongly that the road should not go through <br />at this time. <br />IS
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.