My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9, 1998 <br />(U\0 - U2329 Janies Render - Continued) <br />Mark Gronberg commented that the hammerhead is an approved fire truck turnaround in <br />many cities He noted that the uniform fire code calls for a 20' road. He also referenced <br />the close proximity to Tonkawa. Gronberg added that the three lot subdivision would be <br />in keeping with the neighborhood. <br />Goeiten asked if Jabbour did not visualize the street going through, what width he felt the <br />road should be and whether private or public. Jabbour responded that this is the best <br />time to obtain an underlying easement. He asked the Council whether the City needs the <br />easement and how wide it should be and how long the road should be. <br />Peterson said she agreed with Kelley that the Council is to provide for the health, safety, <br />and welfare of its community but noted that qualify of life is also important. She felt a <br />narrower road was appropriate for the neighborhood. <br />Jabbour said he agreed with Moorse in questioning if the intent of the code can be met <br />without having to build a major road while providing fire protection for the homes. He <br />does not feel the welfare of the people would be placed in Jeopardy but questioned where <br />the new residents will park. <br />Kelley commented that the first three homes access on CoRd 51 and that is the logical <br />place for access for all of the homes Council members agreed. He noted that if all of the <br />homes were being plotted today, all six lots could access from a 28' easement at the rear, <br />but he understands that this is not possible. Jabbour concurred that the Council must <br />work with what is there. <br />Render suggested an alternative of a 25' road easement on the property at this time. In <br />the ftiture if more roadway is needed, easements can be acquired from other properties. <br />Jabbour agreed. Oatfron was asked to venty that there is lo‘ of easement now and the <br />1 7' additional feet would equal the 25'. Gaflron said he would have to confirm with City <br />Attorney Barrett that the 8' easement could be used for a road. Gronberg indicated that <br />information indicated it was a road easement and not a driveway easement. <br />Jabbour asked Council if the easement is necessary'. Kelley said the minimum amount of <br />easement should be 33'. Flint said he also favored the 33' easement but did not support <br />the road going through. Peterson and Goetten agreed Goetten said she assumed this did <br />not include any credit for hardcover. Jabbour confirmed that it did not. He noted the <br />applicant would also be required to mitigate on site for ponding.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.