Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT\' COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9, 1998 <br />(#10 - #2339 James Render - Continued) <br />Carlson indicated that the low portion of Birch Lane is in a flood plain. He asked how far <br />the flood plain extends. Jabbour suuuested Carlson discuss the issue with staff' He noted <br />that the Watershed District was redefining the flood plain, and this is a concern for the <br />Comprehensive Plan update. Jabbour informed Carlson that the Council will be <br />discussing stormwater at their work session. Carlson asked that an answ'er be given <br />regarding the possible connection of Birch Lane as it w ill affect many homes. <br />Mr. Lindner, 3440 North Shore Drive, reported that there are 4 homes serv’ed on his 10' <br />driveway. He noted that the fire chief had indicated at the Planning Commission meeting <br />that a fire truck must be within 500' of a pool to serve a property. Lindner said all of the <br />homes located in the back of the area can be served from CoRd 51 so questioned why <br />access needs to be provided elsewhere for the equipment. He felt a 28 ’ road was not <br />aesthetically pleasing, noting there are smaller roads in the City. <br />Lindner said he has experienced problems with having the Maxwell Bay access nearby. <br />He felt the road would add to that problem, and he would be further affected if the road <br />was connected. Lindner noted there is no room for children to play in front of the homes <br />and the road would eliminate the ability for the children to play in the rear of the homes. <br />Lindner reported that his home is 1500 s.f and others were about 2000-2500 s.f He <br />questioned how the proposed 4000 s.f homes would fit in to the neighborhood. Render <br />responded that the 4000 s.f includes all hardcover, including driveway. Lindner said he <br />would like to see the property divided into two lots only and asked that no variances be <br />allowed. <br />Ed Engler, 3450 Birch Lane, reported that Birch Lane ends at his garage. He noted the <br />large amount of traffic due to the public launch, the public access, and nearby marinas <br />resulting in no shelter trom traltic tor many ot the neighDors. it the road was connected, <br />it would increase this problem. He felt the road connection would be dangerous and <br />create an unhealthy situation <br />Debra Robertson, 3440 North Shore Drive, said the 10 ’ driveway has sensed the four <br />homes for over 30 years with no problems. It baffled her to think that a 28' road was <br />required to serve three homes Robertson reported that Birch Lane did run through the <br />property 80 years ago and a trade for access to Crystal Bay w as made for CoRd 51 . The <br />road connection would result in their losing their access to North Arm, and the properties <br />would be surrounded by three roads causing increased traffic <br />Jabbour reported that the reason a 28 ’ road w as recommended was due to the vision of it <br />becoming a public road in the future He said the Council is obligated to recommend <br />access that would accommodate fire trucks Jabbour said the council is aware that the <br />area is congested and is attempting to control it as much as possible He said it is not the <br />Council's vision to surround homes w ith roads. <br />13