Laserfiche WebLink
Council does not deem appropriate# Council can reconsider whether <br />to: <br />A. Alter level of services to be provided or <br />B. Choose to do in house. <br />As for cost and who is to pay for it# it would be staff's <br />recommendation that it would be solely borne by the City of Orono <br />separate from the Police budget. Even if included in the Police <br />budget as a basic item# the City of Orono would bear 70% of it. <br />The portion of the non-budgeted amount for 1991 would be an <br />anticipated savings for a Police Chief starting at a compensation <br />level lower than the retiring Chief of which Orono would realize <br />70% of those savings. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Issue #1 - Determination of a selection process - <br />1. Approve a process. <br />2. Amend and approve. <br />3. Table for further discussion. <br />4. Table for further input. <br />5. Take no action. <br />Issue #2 - Use of an executive search firm. <br />1. Approve and transmit for request for proposal to determine <br />cost. <br />2. Amend and transmit. <br />3. Table for further discussion. <br />4. Choose not to undertake an executive search firm. <br />RECOMMENDATICT “ As of February 7th input had been given from two <br />of the counciImembers. As such# given the significance of this <br />process that the item be tabled until February 25# 1991. It is <br />recommended that once reviewed by Council they adopt a process to <br />act as a guideline for selection subject to review once the <br />response to the request for proposal are received. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _# seconded by _# Council table for <br />final discussion on Febraury 25, 1991. Ayes _# Nays _.