Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. and Mrs. Lee Harren August 17, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />connection to go around the pool, but which was not otherwise a ; <br />limiting factor. The State Health Department requires that the <br />setback between a well and an air tested sewer line must be a minimum <br />of 20', You suggested that a more feasible and less expensive <br />connection route would be around the east side of your driveway to the <br />southeast corner of your property. It appears your connection could <br />take either a southwest or southeast route and not affect your well or <br />neighboring wells. <br />City staff and consultants then investigated the feasibility of <br />extending a stub to your southeast lot corner, and found that such a <br />connection was very feasible, via an additional 120' extension of a <br />lateral already proposed within Gardner's driveway which served <br />Gard.ner and Anderson. A stub would be extended from that lateral to <br />your southeast property boundary. <br />In your April 29th letter you suggested an alternate route along the <br />portion of Outlot D located west of Landmark Drive, but there is no <br />30'-40' clear out lot/easement along the west side of Cutlot D. In <br />fact, as the attached road plan indicates, the pavement abuts the west <br />line of Outlot D for a good distance and there is a 20' clear area <br />t of the road in which sewer might be constructed, but this still <br />leaves the problem of having to replace a large portion of the cul-de- <br />sac and cutting through the hill to serve Kyle's. <br />The City would be responsible for obtaining all necessary easements <br />across adjacent properties to bring a stub to your property boundary <br />from the east. The cost of providing service to your southeast <br />boundary would be absorbed within the general sewer project and would <br />not increase your assessment. <br />During an executive session at their July 27th meeting, the City <br />Council reviewed your concerns and the various connection options. <br />Council directed that staff proceed on the basis that your property <br />will be served by a stub extended to the southeast boundary of your <br />property, A copy of the staff memo from that meeting is attached. <br />I hope this helps to clarify the City's position on providing sewer <br />service to your property. We can discuss these issues further at our <br />meeting on the 26th. <br />Sincerely^ <br />Ron Moorse <br />City Administrator <br />RM/ch