My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
09-14-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2024 1:25:25 PM
Creation date
4/12/2024 1:21:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. and Mrs. Lee Harren August 17, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />connection to go around the pool, but which was not otherwise a ; <br />limiting factor. The State Health Department requires that the <br />setback between a well and an air tested sewer line must be a minimum <br />of 20', You suggested that a more feasible and less expensive <br />connection route would be around the east side of your driveway to the <br />southeast corner of your property. It appears your connection could <br />take either a southwest or southeast route and not affect your well or <br />neighboring wells. <br />City staff and consultants then investigated the feasibility of <br />extending a stub to your southeast lot corner, and found that such a <br />connection was very feasible, via an additional 120' extension of a <br />lateral already proposed within Gardner's driveway which served <br />Gard.ner and Anderson. A stub would be extended from that lateral to <br />your southeast property boundary. <br />In your April 29th letter you suggested an alternate route along the <br />portion of Outlot D located west of Landmark Drive, but there is no <br />30'-40' clear out lot/easement along the west side of Cutlot D. In <br />fact, as the attached road plan indicates, the pavement abuts the west <br />line of Outlot D for a good distance and there is a 20' clear area <br />t of the road in which sewer might be constructed, but this still <br />leaves the problem of having to replace a large portion of the cul-de- <br />sac and cutting through the hill to serve Kyle's. <br />The City would be responsible for obtaining all necessary easements <br />across adjacent properties to bring a stub to your property boundary <br />from the east. The cost of providing service to your southeast <br />boundary would be absorbed within the general sewer project and would <br />not increase your assessment. <br />During an executive session at their July 27th meeting, the City <br />Council reviewed your concerns and the various connection options. <br />Council directed that staff proceed on the basis that your property <br />will be served by a stub extended to the southeast boundary of your <br />property, A copy of the staff memo from that meeting is attached. <br />I hope this helps to clarify the City's position on providing sewer <br />service to your property. We can discuss these issues further at our <br />meeting on the 26th. <br />Sincerely^ <br />Ron Moorse <br />City Administrator <br />RM/ch
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.