My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
09-14-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2024 1:25:25 PM
Creation date
4/12/2024 1:21:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fo:, o\,CITYofORONO <br />M*inicipa] Offices <br />Post Office Box 66 <br />Cn slaJ Bay, Minnesota 553234)066 <br />August 17, 1992 <br />Mr. and Mrs. Lee Barren <br />175 Landmark Drive <br />Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 <br />Re: Municipal Sewer <br />Dear Mr. and Mrs. Barren: <br />This letter is to clarify the City's position regarding your sewer <br />service . <br />During the initial sewer project planning, it was determined that the <br />Kyle property (185 Landmark Drive) was less than 2 acres and liad a <br />failing septic system. Tliat fact and the mere geographical location <br />in relation to the entire project area, led to an early conclusion to <br />serve your immediate neighborhood. <br />In the normal situation, a sewer lateral would have been constructed <br />within Landmark Drive, with stubs to serve your property, the Evans' <br />vacant lot, and an extension along Kyle's driveway outlet to serve <br />their property. This lateral would have served your property at the <br />southeast boundary but would have been extremely expensive to <br />construct due to replacement of your private road. Further, the <br />extension to the Kyle's along their outlot would be similarly <br />expensive due to the extreme depth. <br />In order to reduce the cost of the project (and therefore the cost to <br />the property owners) it was determined that the lateral would be <br />constructed along the old driveway along the west side of Evans' <br />building site. This lateral would end at Kyle's property line and <br />stubs would be placed to serve all three properties. Your stub v;ould <br />have been at the southwest boundary of your property. <br />Subsequent to this plan, you initiated discussions with various City <br />staff and consultants regarding the extreme expense of connection to a <br />stub at this location on your property. The main problem factors <br />included having to follow a connection route northwest around the <br />existing pool, then south through the hill to get to the southwest <br />corner. The location of your well was a factor which forced tlie <br />TKI.tI’llONE-47jej57 • KVX-473-0SI0
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.