Laserfiche WebLink
roi lowing Mayor Duffs presentation members asKea a few <br />*0^3. and presence of wetlands were <br />consideration by the MVCC a few years ago <br />wUoUiiL *^ccept solely on-site systems for <br />mentioned that testing of the wetlands <br />ThL2^ revealed any adverse impacts from sewage svstems. <br />There was some discussion of the lot width issue ana <br />density in general and its relationship to <br />n»? ?? unaewered areas. Nick Duff did point <br />requires annual inspection of <br />nSedJ S* upgrading or other maintenance whenneeded. Overall, members did not seem to have major <br />concerns with the flexibility items requested by Woodland. <br />A. Spring Park <br />‘^® presentation of this request. He <br />con?2,nT«2‘® copies of an ll page document <br />® ®®®° summarizing the areas needing <br />rtitiJi giving background reasoning, followed bydetailed information and rationale for each area. <br />hiiLi^® 5^ several maps. Brixiua then explained some <br />develoSeS (only .SJu?' <br />niw r*^ undeveloped). He mentioned the City comp ted a <br />SoS*t?;S*’!?®^;^^® in the proceas of <br />^ Stormwater Management <br />the DNR^Shori?f«2®^?^®?“®?^ ^°®® n°^ comply with <br />no iStLt^nn respects. The City hasof adopting new standards which would result in <br />nonconforming status for uses in all zones. They contend <br />dSteloomeSt^^anS^id landowner's rights, inhibitdevelopment, and adversley affect property values. <br />dJJ a^to^d!lfiJSh They have inventoried background technical <br />staJdlrH^ which parts of the City and areas of thestandards will require flexibility approval. <br />S i n;"o I S?3 ■ whlS'i^eSive I Sjnelt ‘‘ <br />denaitv raouirfUMM y**®' ‘ho city proposea to aeet DNR <br />but to^rfrwJt areas designated for low density.exceed the. (up to 13 units/ocre) for high <br />hJ ?*"■“>' *" ‘heae areaa would be controlledby requiring conformance with maximum density. lot size <br />lapervioua lialta. and atorawater aanageaSit ;t.Sda?dl