My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
08-24-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 3:01:59 PM
Creation date
4/9/2024 2:58:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - August 12, 1992 <br />should not be granted until the marina is in conformity. If they <br />are not in conformity with the code and the interpretations of <br />the code, Callahan finds it extremely difficult to give them a <br />license and easy to deny the license. The reason for turning <br />down the license will be the sections they are in violation of. <br />Gaffron stated this did not so3ve any problems. ^ Callahan <br />responded the problem of what to do about the 1992 licenses is <br />out of the way. Jabbour asked if they were being denied a <br />license because of violations to the landscaping code. Callahan <br />said if they were in violaiton of the code at all they should be <br />denied a license. <br />Goetten asked what the next step would be if the licenses <br />were denied. Callahan said, "move to Item 2 on the Agenda which <br />is changing the ordinances". Jabbour added that if the licenses <br />were to be denied, nothing should be enforced for awhile. <br />Callahan stated that they were not being asked to enforce <br />anything, only to grant licenses. <br />Debbie Breneman asked if their money would be returned for <br />the years that have been paid. Jabbour explained that the money <br />was not to buy a license but for the aoplication. The payment of <br />money does not guarantee a license. C.illahan added that the Lake <br />Use Committee has no power to deny licenses and that there would <br />be no repayment of fees, at least that is how he would vote at <br />Council. <br />Kelley commented that he would like to let the past be the <br />past and rewrite the ordinances moving forward. Attempts will be <br />made to refer back to previous codes. Jabbour also added that <br />the Committee should advise the Council that code as it exists <br />does not lend itself to the operation of the marinas in the <br />1990's and a new code needs to be prepared based on the 1990's <br />and beyond. He specifically noted the sale of boats at marinas <br />as being prohibited by the Comprehensive Plan yet he feels boat <br />sales should be allowed. <br />Kelley made a motion for the Committee to deny the licenses <br />of the marinas based on the non-conformity with the current <br />codes, directing staff not to issue any citations because of <br />those non-conformities and also directing staff to begin <br />working on updating the code. Goetten seconded the motion. <br />4 Ayes, 0 Nays, Jabbour Abstain. This will be <br />brought to the August 24 Council meeting. <br />Callahan suggested the Committee direct the staff to prepare <br />a report of the existing violations so the Council will have a <br />clear cut understanding of the reasons why the licenses should <br />not be granted under the present code. If the staff comes to the <br />conclusion there are no violations, then that will be reported. <br />Kelley added this should be kept very short, listing each marina <br />with three or four things with no narrative. <br />Continuing with a discussion about how to deal with <br />revisions to the ordinances, Callahan reviewed the minutes of the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.