Laserfiche WebLink
1.2.2 <br />1.2.2.1 <br />1.2.2.2 <br />1.2.2.3 <br />1.2.2.4 <br />1.2.2.5 <br />1.2.2.6 <br />1.2.3 <br />ip-C ’ <br />Reouired Information. The prospective bidder <br />Engineer with the tollowing for evaluation: <br />shall provide the <br />Applicable specifications and typical fabrication drawings showing <br />cross sections, details, attachments, connections, anchorage details <br />and all other necessary information for adequate product analysis. If <br />siioilar information was previously provided for a Michigan Waterways <br />Commission sponsored project designed using these specifications, that <br />information may be substituted with the understanding that the project <br />engineer will be the final authority on the adequacy of the material <br />provided. <br />A list of existing installations placed during the required five (5) <br />year performance period where floating dock, systems similar to that to <br />be qualified have been installed at locations with similar climatic <br />and ice conditions. Such listing shall also include the number of <br />slips at each location, date installed and the name, address and <br />telephone number of the installation's owner, or the Owner's local <br />contact. <br />Catalog information on all commercial equipment being installed as <br />part of the system, whether specified or offered as a substitution. <br />General literature covering the floating dock manufacturer and his <br />product. <br />Design calculations for piers, connectors, bracing, flotation, <br />bridges, anchorages and related pier system components based upon <br />specified loadings and conditions. Decking shall not be considered as <br />part of the load carrying structure. All drawings and calculations <br />submitted must be sealed by a Registered Professional Engineer ex­ <br />perienced in the design of floating piers and anchorages. If the <br />engineer is not a full-time employee of the pier manufacturer, proof <br />must be provided of satisfactory experience in floating pier system <br />design Including anchorages for conditions similar to those which will <br />be experienced on this project. The burden of proof of the merit of <br />the proposed floating pier system including anchorages is upon the <br />manufacturer. If similar design information was previously provided <br />for a Michigan Waterways Commission sponsored project designed using <br />these specifications, that design information may be substituted with <br />the understanding that the project engineer will be the final ai '‘‘jr- <br />ity on the adequacy of the material provided. <br />After review of the qualification package, the Engineer shall inform <br />the prospective bidder in writing no later than ^_ _ _ _ _days prior <br />to bid opening as to the acceptability of the bidder's system. The <br />Engineer's decision shall be final. <br />The successful bidder shall furnish and install one of the pre­ <br />qualified pier systems found acceptable in writing by the Engineer. <br />- 2