Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />i' <br />XI■w1 <br />ri <br />V <br />.t, <br />k <br />i.>*: <br />V-A <br />^- <br />K--;-. <br />K <br />_ V?v. <br />m <br />Memo <br />July 29, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />Spring Park's consulting planners presented their flexibility <br />request on July 29th. I would encourage Council to carefully review <br />the memo from Alan Brixius. As we expected. Spring Park has an <br />existing level of development that is nowhere near the DNR's goals. <br />The thrust of their proposal is to continue the existing level of <br />development, which they claim is needed to survive economically, and <br />they suggest that they be given consideration for providing multiple <br />family housing alternatives and coininercial opportunities that have not <br />been made available by other communities around the lake. <br />While no formal response is required at the moment. Council may <br />wish to begin considering what response to the Spring flexibility <br />request might be appropriate when the formal flexibility request <br />notice is received from DNR. <br />Wayzata apparently has been in discussion with DNR regarding <br />their informal submittal but the technical review committee has seen <br />none of that information to-date. <br />Tonka Bay , Minnetonka Beach, Shorewood , and Mound are expected to <br />be presenting their ordinances and flexibility requests in September. <br />The remaining cities (Excelsior, Minnetonka , Greenwood , Victoria , and <br />Deephayen ) appear to be making slower progress. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />No action is required at this time. <br />"i:.-r-f'