Laserfiche WebLink
Jtoy^lS, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />Because of this "reasonable control" rather than an outright <br />prohibition# changing our steep slope definition to 12% to conform <br />with the DNR will have little impact on our current regulatory <br />practices• <br />Concliieion <br />Absent a concrete basis that supports 18% as the critical threshold <br />between buildable and unbuildable land# and keeping in mind that the <br />DNR's intent in limiting the use of steep slopes is to direct and <br />regulate activities on those slopes rather than totally prohibit their <br />development# it may be reasonable to accept 12%# for which the DNR <br />feels there is a reasonable basis. <br />water Oriented Accessory Structures <br />DNR regarding this issue is contained in <br />It®; <br />The proposed response to the <br />the attached draft letter. <br />staff Reconmendation <br />1.Agree to revise the steep slope definition in the Shoreland <br />Ordinance to 12% to be consistent with DNR standards. <br />S?:2.Direct staff to forward to the DNR the attached letter which <br />gives a basis for justification to require no lakeshore <br />setback for lock boxes. <br />Ilf' <br />Bp- <br />A’; * <br />m <br />ilt- <br />\ M <br />Is- <br />■ <br />W £; ■r-Vv- <br />.-ymy <br />Wd