My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
05-26-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2024 12:53:30 PM
Creation date
3/22/2024 12:50:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8*. i <br />Memo <br />May 10, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />The Hennepin County Soil Survey categorizes slopes at breakdowns of 0- <br />2%, 2-6%, 6-12%, 12-18%, 18-24%, and 24-35%. The soil survey does not <br />Indicate that a specific slope percentage is necessarily limiting for <br />development, but indici tes that construction costs and the need for <br />more attention to grading and soil erosion protection become factors <br />in the use of slopes for development as slope increases. <br />Our 1978 Septic Code limited septic systems to slopes of 6-12% <br />depending on the system type, and from 12-18% suggested the need for <br />additional design consideration. However, the buildability of a lot <br />using septic systems is not necessarily excluded merely because some <br />portion of the lot is steeper than 18% slope. <br />I have not been able to locate any concrete information as to why 18% <br />was chosen as the boundary between buildable and nonbuildable land in <br />the 1984 subdivision code. For unsewered property, if conforming <br />septic sites are available, it can certainly be argued that it is <br />technically feasible to construct a residence on a slope steeper than <br />18%, and adeguately protect the site from soil erosion and stability <br />problems. Since 1984, staff has rarely if ever invoked the 18% slope <br />dry buildable exclusion, and other than for dealing with septic <br />systems, finds little justification for 1^ ' versus some other <br />percentage slope. <br />In the new Shoreland Ordinance, steep slopes are defined as lands <br />having average slopes <^f 18% or greater as measured over horizontal <br />distances of 50* or more, that are not bluffs. The DNR's proposed <br />definition was primarily to deal with agricultural lands, and reads as <br />follows: <br />"Steep slope" means lands where agricultural activity or <br />development is either not recommended or described as poorly <br />suited due to slope steepness and the site's soil <br />characteristics, as mapped and described in available county soil <br />surveys or other technical reports, unless appropriate design and <br />construction techniques and farming practices are used in <br />accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. Where specific <br />information is not available, steep slopes are lands having <br />average slopes over 12%, as measured over horizontal distances of <br />50* or more, that are not bluffs. <br />Since the agricultural references have little value to Orono, we just <br />adopted the last sentence, changing 12% to 18% to fit our dry <br />buildable" definition. <br />Only five sections of the Shoreland Ordinance provide performance <br />standards on steep slopes. These are attached as Exhibit C.^ These <br />sections tend to place performance standards on certain activities on <br />steep slopes, prohibit others, but generally do not entirely disallow <br />development merely because of the steep topography.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.