My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
02-10-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2024 10:48:01 AM
Creation date
3/4/2024 10:40:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
% <br />pv_ <br />te <br />p: <br />4^- ■ <br />- ■ <br />P'- ■' <br />ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT: <br />#1470 KHAPP/PARTEN <br />4300 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />Mr. Knapp was present <br />Bernhardson reviewed the specific Planning Commission <br />recommendations and explained that this preliminary subdivision <br />proposal does meet the PRD criteria. He said, "The Plannin9 <br />Commission did approve the PRD approach to subdividing this <br />parcel. It will be necessary for Mr. Knapp to file a Conditional <br />UsG Permit application to be reviewed by thPlanning Commission <br />at their January meeting." <br />Gaffron said, "I believe that the <br />conceptual approval of this pl«in so <br />Conditional Use Permit application." <br />applicant is <br />that he can <br />requesting <br />submit a <br />Goetten noted that the Planning Commission had previously <br />considered the provision of future connecting roads from this <br />parcel. She questioned why that was no longer a consideration. <br />Gaffron replied, "The Planning Commission reviev/ed tv;o or <br />three possibilities. The first was to provide an access for the <br />two houses just south of the Luce Line. Both of those property <br />owners adamantly opposed such a plan, stating that their easement <br />from the DNR to cross the Luce Line was sufficient. The Planning <br />Commission felt that the City does not have an obligation to <br />provide an alternate access. However, should it be necessary in <br />the future, there is an outlot that could be used. The second <br />consideration is whether or not there should be a continuation <br />across the Luce Line to Watertov/n Road. Again, the Planning <br />Commission believed that there was no obvious need for that at <br />this time. The third consideration involved the inclusion of Mr. <br />White’s property to the south and a continuation of a road to <br />Bayside. That opportunity is still there, should Mr. White <br />decide to further develop his property." <br />It was moved by Nettles, seconded by Goetten, to give <br />conceptual approval of the PRD concept plan as recommended by the <br />Planning Commission, and direct Mr. Knapp to make the appropriate <br />PRD Conditional Use Permit application. Motion. Ayes-4, Nays-0. <br />Motion passed. <br />#1497 TOBERMAN PROPERTY <br />1960 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />DBNIAL RESOLUTION <br />It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Peterson, <br />to table this matter until the November 26, 1990 Council meeting. <br />Motion, Ayes~4, Nays-0. Motion passed. <br />- 7 - <br />^ . <br />i:v <br />/, ■ <br />I'"w <br />\
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.