Laserfiche WebLink
L) The proposed subdivision which is based on the <br />variance request complies with the qualifications <br />set forth in Resolution #1178 when the Council <br />first addressed the circumstances unique to the <br />property and arguably approved a future <br />subdivision. Resolution #1178 is entitlea <br />"Resolution of the City Council #1178 Determining <br />that One Sanitary Sewer Service will be Provided <br />for the Property Located at 1385 Fox Street, and <br />Determining Standards for any Future Subdivision of <br />the Property". Resolution #1178 reads in pertinent <br />part: <br />1. Any future subdivision of the property must <br />leave not less than 1 acre for the existing <br />residence. <br />2. Any new building site which might be created <br />will comply with all current zoning <br />regulations at the time of subdivision, the <br />intent of this provision being that any new <br />lot created in the future is not intended to <br />be served by the 80-1 Sewer Project but is <br />intended to fully comply with all City on-site <br />sewage treatment requirements. Therefore <br />there is benefit to the property from the <br />construction of the sewer to the extent of one <br />unit. The subdivision proposed by the <br />applicant fully complies with lot size <br />conditions previously imposed by the Council <br />via Resolution #1178. <br />M) The fact that no new substandard building lots <br />would be created by the granting of the variance <br />request is significant. In an interoffice <br />memorandum to the then City Administrator Walter R. <br />Benson dated ouU 10, 1981, City Planner Alan Olson <br />pointed out that the Council had indicated they <br />would look favorably on a future subdivision of the <br />property into one 1> acre sewered parcel and one 2+ <br />acre unsewered parrel. That memorandum reasoned <br />that the subdivision of the Goetten property into <br />two lots, because of its 3.6 acre size, would not <br />Page 5 of 9