10-17-1977 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1977 mAiCE - 7:30 P.M. >Om OF MrJUTES riNO OF OCTOBER 17, 1977 i ORTA GPuMN COraPANY N ’ORTll /\P.M DRIVE : PROPOSAL 10) L\N STRONG 0 FOX STREET DIVISION (Fim) 90) 'jR\ V.TST OLATLORENT 77 SILVIY^mO ROAD D/ISED FRIATCr T, HALL n: n BUILDIN'G EUWATION a: pjato-) 330) T h ' •A-t, .ML—.iMINITTES OF A PIA'T^ING COMIISSION JEETIMG iELD OCTOBER 17, 1977 - PACT; 2 After review and discussion of the revised plan, tie Planning Commission agreed tliat this was an improve ment to the plan approved previously. Gutlirie moved Hannah seconded, to recommend approval. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Tlie Zoning Administrator stated tliat Fritz Gulliclcson is rcciuGStinn vs^rioncG for lot aren find uidtii. ns proPtylfldjacont to Lots 1 and 2 ,vhich the City recently approved as building sites. Tliis application is slightly different tliough in that Mrs. Dongaske, wlio Mr. Gullickson is considering p*. ^ chasing tliis property from, o\med the lot next to tins property (Lot 4) also until she sold Lot 4 in 1972. All setback requirements would be met. Ihe Planning Commission noted that at tlie time of the two previous proposals, the applicants liad been requested to intact Mrs. Dongaske and make some arrangements to possibly purcliase this lot (I^t 3) tliat would projade for a lot rearrangement of these tliree lots into 'b'/o building sites. At the time of each previous application, tlie applicant had informed the Planning Commission tliat Mrs. Dongaske was not willing to sell Lot 3. Uiy is this lot now suddenly available? Tlie applicant was not present to reply to this. llassel moved, Ilurr seconded, to table this matter in order for tlie applicant to be present. ?lotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Tlie Zoning Administrator advised that the applicant is requesting a lot area and width variance for construction of a new house. A residence could be located to meet all setbacl-i requirements, and the Zoning Administrator suggested tliat approval be subject to all otlier setback requirements being met. Ihe area is sewered, and there is no adjacent land available for expansion. Mr. Muliicli pointed out that access from this property to County Road t^l9 would be liazardous. Tliis is similar to the Lucille Olson property directly to the west. Mr. Muliich suggested that the applicant obtain an easement over the same access which we previously provided for Lucille Olson. Ms. Hemen was present. She informed the Planning Commission that an access easement would not be necessary as access can be provided from the rear of the lot to Tonka View via a platted Cit>^ right of way along Park Avenue and Adams Street. After review and discussion of the application, llassel moved, Guthrie seconded, to grant conceptual approval of the variance for lot area and widtli with the undcr- TONIA hEST DIAI-LOPAENT (continued) (^330) FP.TTZ GUUJCKSON 960 FOPJ-ST .ARMS LANE LCT AREA G hTDTII VARIANCE (#315) JOATN HEf^llEN 4766 NORTH SHORl- DRIVE VARIANCE - LOl' AREA f, VJIDTH (#316) % 0' i MINUTES OF A PL'' standing that a] met. Conditions to safety, no at of access avail? Ayes (7), Nays I Tlie Zoning Admii Fulmer had been application and Commission to ii Mr. Richard Full daughter- in - law operating the bi this kind. Tlie; witli possible g' later time. Tli Tlie maximum cap; dogs. Richard Fulmer : closing date on would like some Planning Cormis did not uunt to any possible cli Tlie general con toward this anp liearing had bee concerned publi comments. Tlie to provide reas daytime hours a conditions the public hearing. Tlie Zoning Admi proposed dredgi tlie certified p ment of the app so the neighboT notified. Some approval was al maintenance dre this has not be Mr. Sween, repi along with Mr. that he liad cor secure tliis pei records, they v permit was evei contacted a die Roy Rolierts \dic ago. In talkir original dredgi