10-17-1977 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

■ i Dn\l‘LOPMI-AT :inucd') 0 ! nmJJCKSON FOnnST lA'C \RTi\ G YAIUANCH 5) ^4 '■ • Ifis’ IIENmN 6 NORTH SllORH DRIVli lANCH - LOl' ARI'A f4 mDTH .16) 0T K- Mi iimmiirrmir MINUTES OF A PLTOING COMMISSION 'irmNC \WLTi OCTOBER 17, 1977 - PAGE 3 standing tliat all other setback requirements will be met. Conditions - access to be approved by staff as to safety, no access to County Road “19, and assurance of access availability to Tonka View Lane. Motion Ayes (7), Nays (0). Tlie Zoning Administrator stated that Hr. Richard Fulmer had been in the City office to discuss this application and requested to appear ]'>efore the Planning Commission to introduce himself and liis family. Mr. Ricliard Fulmer introduced liimself and his son and daugliter-in-law, Brian and Cathy Fulmer,who would bo operating the business. Tliis is their first venture of til is kind. Tlioir current plans involve boarding only witli possible grooming and specialized breeding at a later time. Tliis would be a casli and carr>^ service. Tlie maximum capacity of this facility would be 60 dogs. Picliard Fulmer advised that they have a scheduled closing date on this property for October 21. Tliey would like some reassurance at this time from the ^ Planning Corniission concerning tliis application. Tliey did not' uant to enter into any agreement if there \;crc any possible chances for denial of this application. Tlie genera] concensus of the Commission was favorable toward this application. 'Tliey advised that a public hearing had been scheduled to give the neighbors and concerned public an opportunity to oxpress their comments. Tlie applicant indicated he would be willing to provide reasonable access for the public during daytime hours and would comply with any reasonable conditions the City might consider necessary after the public hearing. Tlie Zoning Administrator presented the plan for the proposed dredging of Lafayette Bay. lie advised that tlie certified property owner’s list which is a require ment of the application was not submitted until today so the neighboring property owners have not been notified. Some documentation of previous dredging approtnl was also requested to distinguish between maintenance dredging and initial dredging. To date, this has not been submitted. Mr. Sween, representing the Association, was present along with ^'r. Ilepp. Mr. Sween informed the Commission that ho had contacted the DNL and he was unable to secure tliis permit. In checking their microfilm records, they were unable to find any evidence that a permit was ever granted, lie further advised that he had contacted a dredging company and was given the name of Roy Roberts i.ho had been involwd in dredging many years ago. In talking with Mr. Roberts, he learned that the original dredging of this bay took place in 1930 or before. JOANN letlEN (continued) (#316) ’a’ayside }j:n:'t :ls 3505 KAYZATA T/lUIilVARD TRANSFER OF CONDITIO.'NM. USE PE17IIT (#31S) \mST SnORl- LAFAYETTE BAY ASSOCIATION 2440 OLD BFAQI ROAD DPJiDCINC OF aiVTsT-L AND DISPOSAL OF SPOILS IN TlH’. FRESinNATER BIOLOGICAL ^lARSIl (#319) ■ \ ^ i 1 ■A ■ I Efc. MINUTES OF A PL Mr. Roberts wou if necessary, t feeling tliat nc that time. Mr. Sween went advised tliat tl in 1960. Tliis of their prope- dredging projei the DNR to pro projects, tliey Tlie applicant spoils in the Biological pro the marsh. Tli disposal area policy prohibi feet from tlie a dredging pre this 1,000 fee Mr. Sween stai on the high g: and not in tin plan and cont like building crib the area into tlie mars into the mars Tlie proposed the cdiannel. suction dcvic pipe. Tliis i method of the Commission e> spoils. The involved for Commission ii generally ar< Sex'eral menb' of the I vTI He v;as very little with Minnesota P.i Tlie appliciui project. Tn water into t