Laserfiche WebLink
mlwiiii «mmw.^T k OF A PUNNING CChWlSSlON ^EErING HELD MAY 2, 1977 - PAGE 5 <br />Mr Lauer had no qualms about the location of Mr. Code's <br />H(wev2r, he did feel that the lot was too <br />smJu^contain both the carriage house and the proposed <br />dwelling. <br />JACK RHODE <br />(continued)* <br />(#210) <br />Mr Becker also objected to the use of the wrriage house. <br />Ite*too felt that the lot was too ^11 and this would <br />Vi.- <.r«*itiA. He exnressed his objecticn to the <br />Sfge ifusf rho°ufdre fo^^^^ the propo^d <br />ctnicture should be located near tnis spot, me & <br />Administrator reminded Mr. be <br />is encroaching Mr. Lauer*s property n^. It woiu <br />better to locate the dwelling where there would be th <br />least amount of encroachment. <br />A long discussion followed regarfing the - <br />the proposed ^ellrog. Not Jrtl^uld <br />3: l-aaon*. ^oi: S^ted »at^e would be <br />willing to go alung with the suggestion of the ^or^ng <br />Adild^tratOT which was midway be^een the proposed <br />i~-=tinn and the ave-age setback line. <br />Planning Coraraissiem indicated the^ f <br />OTC main dock for use of surrounding prope^ owners having <br />lake^ccess easement across subject property. <br />iS--rLt <br />failed for lack of a second. <br />Hassel moved. Hosfield seconded, to deny vari^e and that <br />a new application be submitted. Moticn failed. <br />*»* -.w- ^r£- - <br />Guthrie moved, Pesek seconded, that the application be approved <br />^iect to the house being setback a distance ?f <br />frrm the lake as suggested by the zoning administrator nu^ay <br />between 75' lakeshore and ave«^ lof area°Lf^^ te^grantld; <br />^rjolk on this property; and subject to a park dedication fee. <br />artet some discussion, Guthrie withdrew his motion. Hassel^en <br />™vtd tHabie 1*1 application and suggested Mr. I^ode s^^t <br />another revised plan indicating dimensions from lakeshore ro <br />ro^ermiSe actual location and eliminate any future <br />controversy. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />■ ■ g ^ X V ^0 A MW • -- - — w <br />Ur Rhode stated that he was scheduled to be out of town ^rrog <br />^ sSeSSled meeting and that he would submit a revised <br />proposal for the June 6, 1977, meeting. <br />f - <br />: * w* • <br />; > <br />minutes of a PLA^ <br />Mr. Ledstrom was <br />of his horses in <br />located only 50* <br />that this is real <br />A previous owner <br />would like the gc <br />eliminate the haz <br />eliminate that ha <br />shed District is <br />watershed storage <br />as to whether or <br />lies within this <br />that the applican <br />District as to wh« <br />be affected by th <br />After a brief disi <br />table this applies <br />next meeting and ; <br />District concemii <br />Nays (0). The Zoi <br />existing elevatior <br />submitted by Mr. I <br />Attorney Lorens Bi <br />sick. The Zoning <br />the applicant is i <br />standard lot. A \ <br />necessary. There <br />use permit would b <br />house as second dw <br />Mr. Brynestad stat <br />following: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Permission of ' <br />into guest hou <br />Peimit to proc <br />on premises. <br />Be able to put <br />property. <br />Adjoining property <br />Becker*s objected <br />posed location is <br />Commission was cor <br />structures on this <br />and remodeling exi <br />structure and buil <br />the lake. <br />Pesek moved, Hosf; <br />suggested the app] <br />ing only one resic <br />proposed house loc <br />residence to meet <br />only with sufficic <br />parties vho had dc <br />City's adoption ol <br />Ayes (5), Nays (0)