My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
11-22-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 3:59:41 PM
Creation date
1/23/2024 3:57:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />November 19, 1993 <br />SUBJECT: Police Lieutenant Salary Negotiations <br />The City Council has directed that all salaried positions receive <br />a $20.00 per month increase in the City's health insurance <br />contribution and a $21.00 per month increase in salary for 1994. <br />The Business Agent for the Lieutenanu bargaining unit has indicated <br />the $21.00 per month salary increase is not an acceptable <br />adjust!.ent and that the union will submit the salary issue to <br />binding arbitration if this is the City's final offer. <br />I have reviewed this issue with the City's Labor Relations <br />consultant who has indicated it would be very difficult for the <br />City's position to prevail in arbitration. I have developed a <br />proposal that could resolve the pay issue and a number of other pay <br />related issues without reguiring a larger increase in the <br />Lieutenant's base pay. The proposal is to reconfigure the merit <br />pay that is currently in the Lieutenant contract. <br />The other pay related issues that could be resolved through this <br />proposal are as follows: <br />1. When the police Lieutenant contract was first put into <br />place, the Lieutenant's pay schedule was based on the <br />city's overall compensation plan which was based on the <br />Comparable Worth job evaluation study. At that time <br />Lieutenant Cheswick's pay was above the pay reflected in <br />the Lieutenants pay schedule. Because of this <br />difference, the contract included, and still includes, a <br />provision whereby Lieutenant Cheswick's pay level will be <br />brought into compliance with the Lieutenant pay schedule. <br />At this time Lt. Cheswick's pay is 2% above the <br />Lieutenant pay schedule. <br />2. The differential in pay between the Lieutenants and the <br />Police Officers is very small (5.7%); both in terms of <br />the generally accepted differential between a supervisory <br />position and a non“supervisory position, and in terms of <br />the differential between police supervisors and police <br />officers in other comparable cities. This is an area the <br />city is vulnerable in in terms of pay negotiations, <br />especially if the issue is submitted to arbitration. <br />3. The Lieutenant's contract currently provides for 5% merit <br />pay The merit pay is based on the city providing police <br />service to three additional cities. Although the city's <br />continuation of service to the other cities may oe <br />somewhat related to the performance of the Lieutenants, <br />this is not a direct relationship. There is a need to <br />provide a new set of criteria tor earning the merit pay <br />that is directly performance related.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.