09-27-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File 4^1858 September 10. 1993 Page 2 List of Exhibits A • Application B • Applicants Addendum C - Pn^rty Owners List D - Plat Map £ - Septic Map F - Weekman Memo G - Survey H - Section/Floor - Spacing Plan I - Front Elevations J • Covenant for Oversized Accessory Structures Dcscriptioii of Request The 60'x80’ indoor riding arena (pole bam) shall be insulted to the south of the other accessory structures. As required by code, the oversized accessory structure shall assume the setbacks of a principal structure and will well exceed the 100’ rear and 50* side setback (review Exhibit G). Based on the information received with the wall section, it would appear the maximum height to the high point of the gable roof wiU be 24’ and will meet the 30’ aUowed height and will not exceed the height of the two story principal st^nire. Sloping lopograpl^ of the south yard also help to minimize impact of the height in relation to the surrounding reskSential unit properties. The oversized accessory structure will exceed the allowed footprint area and with the of the riding arena the property will now exceed the aUowed area for total accessory structures on the 10-acre parcel. Refer to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C-3), the accessory stnicture ordinance requires the owners to execute a covenant to be filed on the chain of title of the property whereby the owners agree to maintain property at its current area to support the oversized accessory strucrjre. If this property were to be subdivided in the future, it shall be the owners ’ responsibility to remove said structure. The other oversized accessory strucnire on the property, 36’x48’ horse stable, was installed prior to the oversized accessory structure ordinance and there is no covenant gv>veming the structure. Review Exhibit J, a sample of the covenant developed by City and used when oversized accessory structures are constructed on a property. ^____ ^