My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
09-13-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2024 2:00:56 PM
Creation date
1/12/2024 1:57:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MLNUTES OF TllE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MLETING <br />HELD AUGUST 16, 1993 <br />ZONING FII.E ^1845 - CONT. <br />Mabusth explained applicant seeks direction concerning approval of a proposed lot line <br />rearrangement and variance for the development ot a vacant lot. The access to Mr. <br />I>eminernian s pro ’ erty is on Wildhurst Trail. lie has purchased tax forfeited property and has <br />about 33.000 s.f. in area. The proposed lot lire rearrangement will reduce the vacant lot to <br />19,600 s.f. Mr. Lemmerman’s homestead lot uould be increased to 26.150 s.f. <br />l.emmerman explained that the undeveloped lot has an unusual shape and a steep hill. He has <br />propo.sed to exchange part of the property with a neighbor and sell part to another but nobody <br />is interested. He has been there for 36 years and has cleaned up that area. It has a nice view <br />of Forest Lake. <br />Chair Schroeder asked if it is a buildable lot. <br />Mabusth answered the lot needs variance approval as it is in a I acre zone. It is sewer <br />approved. <br />Nolan asked whether it would be a benefit to realign the lot for better balance. Your wall is <br />only a couple of feet behind your garage. The line could actually be moved further down to <br />balance. <br />Lcmmennan said that would not be a problem and noted the hill being useless. He explained <br />several years ago the residence had burned down on the vacant land. <br />Chair Schroeder stated that the issue here would be a lot area variance. <br />Mabusth explained a lot area variance would be needed if he was to build on this parcel. A lot <br />width variance would not be necessary because he meets 80% of that but he doesn ’t meet 80% <br />for the required lot areas. <br />l.emmerman stated that he would have no problem dropping the lot line down, <br />Mabusth asked if members kK)k favorably at the current proposal for a lot line rearrangement. <br />It was reviewed favorably in 1985 and the Planning Commission gave a recommendation of <br />positive direction - formal action on a sketch plan is not required and members need only give <br />direction to the applicant. It would also help to determine lot lines by examining a topographic <br />map but we d*' not have any topt) information. <br />f
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.