Laserfiche WebLink
Sewer/Waier Memo <br />May 27, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />Sewer Assessment <br />The following is a table that indicates how Lots 16 through 19 were assessed for sewer. <br />■SF.WFR 1965 - LS-1 <br />Ownership as of 1965 <br />Plat 43300 Assessed (assessment drawings) <br />Lot 16 <br />Parcel: <br />0500 60’/1 Unit STP-IC*McNeal <br />Separate Lot <br />Lot 17 0550 55’/No STP-IC McNeal <br />Separate Lot <br />Lot 18 0600 55’/No STP-IC ' McNeal <br />Separate Lot <br />Lot 19 0650 55’/I Unit STP-IC Hulse ? <br />or Kelgzan ? <br />Separate lot <br />*"STP-1C" is the $225 sewer plant charge, <br />still collected today for new connections in <br />which was assessed for all existing residences, and <br />1 specific projects (no inflation factor) <br />At the time City sewer was installed, all properties were assessed a footage charge of <br />$12.00 per front foot. Those lots containing a residence were also charged the $225 plant <br />charge. Lot 18 was assessed 55’ x $12 = $660. <br />Staff has found no documentation suggesting that vacant lots were assessed the plant <br />charee if they were considered buildable. so it is quite possible that no buildability determination <br />was made at that time. Other than the plant charge, there was no "sewer unit" charge for <br />properties in the 1965 project. <br />Tlie 1965 .sewer as-built contains a cormector arrow for Lots 16-17-18, and indicates one <br />stub was placud on those three lots. This stub was on Lot 18, and the house on Lot 17 was <br />connected to this stub. It is likely that the Lot 18 stub location retlected the best feasible <br />connection location based on the septic system serving the house.