10-17-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

may be detachedr subject to the action 10.20 - R- famlly detached 3 - Conditional dwellings. The IS or controlled 11 be limited to 3e no grading or d in the final tent plan, and lers' association e of maintenance conditions and the locating of ansr etc. This locations within lave been called r 19th meeting. of preliminary ist fulfilled Lll improvements nd posted with ssure that these ruction. - . T'- / * ■ TV'” bI r i VV; y 1. ’ V « T Zoning File #1334 October 13, 1988 Page 5 of 7 Subdivision 9 - Subdivision requirements. All provisions of the subdivision regulations have been followed under the PRD format. Review your previous plan that showed the actual survey for preliminary subdivision. Outlots define the commercial corridors not considered under this current plan. The road will be designated as a separate out lot as will the open space area surrounding it. A separate outlet will now define the future road corridor located within the southern portion of the property. Each residential unit will be defined as a lot. The actual building pad defined by the required setbacks cannot be shown on the final plat, but will be shown on the final development plan. All of the other conditions of subdivision approvals will be required - open space easements, drainage and utility easements, drainage easements over retention pond in the commercial corridor at the southeast corner, underlying road and utility easements over road outlot and future road corridor within southern portion of the property, and in this case, a subdivider's agreement to be filed against the chain of title of each of the properties outlining all restrictions on the use of the individual residential lots and the shared open space. The applicant has filed for the required permit from the M.C.W.D. to review all proposed lot gradings and storm sewer Improvements. Approval of this subdivision and PRD will be conditioned on the installation of a retention pond in the southeast corner of the property. The guiding principal for the permit review by the M.W.C.C. is that surface run-off from the fully developed site must exit the property at the S2une rate from the undeveloped property. The applicant must provide the necessary hydraulic information based on the 100 year storm standard. The site grading plan should include plans for the pond. The Park Commission at an earlier review, determined no need for park land dedication but asked that a bike/hike trail be designated through the commercial corridor of the property as part of the comprehensive bike trail system. Applicant has provided adequate width with the 60* outlot shown in the southern portion of the property for both road and trail. The City will accept park fee payments in lieu of the park land dedication ($400.00 per lot). Review Exhibit C, enclosed in your original packets for the September meeting. If entrance monuments are to exceed a 3%' height, this should be noted at this review and approved so that the applicant need not return for a separate variance application. In PRD/Subdivision applications, th^ City approves entrance monuments when proposed by the subdividers. V-/.. * wmm ’mik N rLitl LNiS IF.-", .y'■ 4' Zoning File October 13, Page 6 of 7 The api concerned th or greater d site will p] owner. It i than a perso far more The City aff Once again, restrictive building li except for t areas which individual Planning Co building on be included that may be existing tre< 1. Est2 limits i 2. Coni floor a: 3. Pla at a ce establii Applies greater tree remove one o: the Homeownei is to be the the subdivld Other Planni that could fc which is to i Staff Re Staff r< Class III pr property loc« of the subdj ordinances, preliminary following con