10-17-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

»vislons of the :he PRD format, al survey for il corridors not designated as a oundlng It. A rrldor located tsldentlal unit defined by the t will be shown conditions of ace easements, r retention pond inderlylng road corridor within a subdivider's of each of the the Individual the M.C.W.D. to :s. Approval of tallatlon of a The guiding lurface run~off i same rate from the necessary dard. The site lo need for park ited through the islve bike trail outlet shown In rail. The City Lcatlon ($400.00 )r the September this should be ! not return for It Ions, th3 City 3. IT >1 ■> ■ ' 4 tS: • ■ -' v.<: .1:‘‘ty.-’T. li- ■ M’1 -kl mm ' 5.' K::’- !"S?' ¥ 11 ? »>-» * • Zoning File #1334 October 13, 1988 Page 6 of 7 The applicant's representative has made staff aware that they are concerned that the requirement of the Planning Commission to locate all 8" or greater diameter trees within each building pad and locating a specific site will place severe limits on the future planning abilities of each new owner. It Is the developer's concern that no one understands a site better than a person who wishes to put a house on a given property and who becomes far more familiar with the physical characteristics of their property. The City affectively assumes the role of a site planner for each homeslte. Once again, staff would ask the Planning Commission to review the restrictive covenants. Exhibit C In your packets. Note there are no building limitations set forth In any of the sections of the covenants except for the setbacks and the controls on the woodlands or no-grading areas which have now been expanded Into the required yard areas within the Individual lots. Section 10.32, Subdivision 6, certainly gives the Planning Commission the right to ask for the location of the proposed building on each lot. Planning Commission may consider other controls to be Included within the restrictive covenants and the subdivider's agreement that may be In keeping with the Intent of the PRD which Is to preserve existing trees and other physical attributes of the property, as follows: 1. Establish limits on accessory structures limits on accessory structures. The covenants place no 2. Consider percentage of structural coverage for pads similar to the floor area ratio to be designed for the principal structure. 3. Place a limit on grading within each pad requlrlitj City approval at a certain level - 40 to 50 cubic yards. The City Engineer may establish a reasonable level. Applicant has asked that If a plan Is presented locating all 8" or greater trees within each pad and at a future time a home owner has to remove one of these specimens, who Is to give him permission? Shall It be the Homeowners' Association? The City? A joint approval situation? If it is to be the City Is has to be spelled out In a special restriction within the subdivider's agreement as it Is not specified within your ordinances. Other Planning Commission members may have other Ideas on other measures that could be taken that would protect the original Intent of this PRD which is to preserve the natural woodlands that Involves the entire site. Staff RecoBmendation - Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for PRD and Class III preliminary subdivision application of Sidney Rebers for the property located at 715 North Brown Road finding all appropriate standards of the subdivision regulations, the Planned Residential Development ordinances, and R-IA Zoning District Standards have been met per amended preliminary plans dated 10/12/88 by BRW. Approval Is subject to the following conditions: m Zoning Flic October 13« Page 7 of " 1. P $400), 2. 6: outlot corrld 4. SI In so Inf on size o 5. La approi stands 6. Su for tb before define