Laserfiche WebLink
or a 50* outlet with <br />as urban (with curbs <br />oposed (note: Code <br />ived width for "more <br />jh 6" lotSr but does <br />rectly across from a <br />}ears to be adequate <br />ormal ownership and <br />.ng Painter's Creek; <br />oint adjacent to the <br />commented regarding <br />tired where run-off <br />Icant's surveyor has <br />ha Creek Watershed <br />ith slopes at 6% or <br />' mound-type septic <br />Dst of the lots, *^’ie <br />oil survey, include <br />It and clay loam, and <br />All but the E£unel <br />:ype septic systems. <br />it':-.; <br />'J <br />•V* <br />t ff> V r <br />Ml, <br />Zoning Pile #1330 <br />September 13, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />The areas mapped by the Soil Survey as Famel are likely incorrect, <br />given that by definition Hamel scil normally occurs in flatter <br />depressions between steeper hills, and the soil survey overlay onto <br />the topographical survey shows Haunel in areas of 6% to 18% slopes, not <br />very likely (see Exhibit G, Soil Association Diagram from Soil <br />Survey). <br />3. Orono Codes do not require septic testing at the time of <br />subdivision for lots exceeding five acres in area unless unusual site <br />conditions are anticipated. This code requirement presumes that it is <br />fo determine where houses will be located on a five—acre <br />property, and that most lots containing five dry buildable acres have <br />a very high likelyhood that suitable sites exist on the property. <br />For this currently proposed subdivision, staff would recommend that <br />soil borings be completed by the applicant's consultant for Lots 2 and <br />6, both of which indicate that the flatter areas of the property are <br />mapped as Hamel soils. Staff feels it is appropriate at this time to <br />request this information to determine whether suitable mound sites are <br />feasible on those two lots. Staff will work with applicant's <br />consultant regarding the location and number of borings required. <br />C) Future Road Extensions: <br />Staff and the City Engineer have reviewed the development in the <br />surrounding properties in relation to the need for fut’^re road access to <br />the east or south. Staff and the City Engineer concur that, since the <br />neighboring properties are generally developed to the maximum five acre <br />density for this area, under the current zoning standards no future road <br />connections would be anticipated. <br />D) Easements Required; <br />The City will require dedication on the plat of Conservation and <br />Flowage Easements over the wetlands occurring in Lots 2 and 3, and an <br />Easement of a width yet to be determined along the length of Painter's <br />Creek in Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5. Additi'>nally, the standard 10 ’ perimeter and <br />roadway drainage and utility easements will be required, as well as similar <br />easements 5' in width each side of interior lot lines. <br />' ^\ <br />m <br />Zoning Pil <br />September <br />Page 4 of <br />Roadwa <br />The p <br />the City f. <br />F) Park F< <br />The Pi <br />5+ acre lol <br />Discussion <br />This ( <br />each lot a] <br />family res: <br />1. Dc <br />the en <br />2. Ar <br />not sh' <br />Two qu- <br />the City En< <br />1. Wi- <br />a publ <br />road ei <br />2. Doe <br />at the <br />hence ^ <br />at the <br />The Put <br />a need for a <br />'.mm