Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />I <br />f: <br />I- <br />e - 2. <br />(#4) miEW<ECTLEMMEW^.«»TONKAVlEWI^E.V^^ <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />j * .u of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication <br />Chair Schroeder noted that the <taff renort and outlined the area that <br />were <» Be wiU. .he City. Meb»s.h this was awasbuadable. Ernest Ummennan was present uiairacnroe <br />public heating continued from a pervious meeong. <br />Ken Hickey suted he owned the lot <br />-e er.10. in .0^4. He <br />beUevcd the buildable area was too close to his house. <br />r>3SHSl“ <br />and the top of bluff definition as it would apply to the subject property. <br />Lindquist suted that he had problems with the appUcation 1^“'** <br />4p^d “h. lot line fearungemen. with the proposed ‘ ■ <br />that they could no. take the position tiiat the loB were now wo small. <br />Nolan commented that since they had approved the tots, then needed to J’*” <br />it can b~ given the parameters they have avaUable. He preferred to gwe the applicant a <br />reasonabto budding envelope and see something built that was feasible. <br />Hickey Slated he felt that the tot should not be built on and while <br />oDDOituuity to purchase the property he fell it was too expeosivc. <br />su^d thauhe Planning Commission could approve the request with a note “ <br />that the Planning Commission would look at changing the building envelope g <br />review when plans were formally submitted. <br />It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of L*"* <br />t s s: ssnysrsa <br />enVloA- Ayes 5. nays 1. Lindquist suted he felt the lot area was too smaU lo conum <br />% <br />--__J