My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
07-11-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 9:23:06 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 9:20:57 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4-. <br />minutes of the orono planning conpg|.D MARCH 21,1994 I k'SION MEETING <br />(#7) #1911 ERNEST U MAN - cont <br />It was moved by t seconded by Smith, to table Applkatioa #1910 for Ernest <br />i^^fnnu^mn 4620 Tookavicw Lane, for a lot area variance and a variance that would aUow <br />of the bluff impact zone for 30 days to allow the City time to make a <br />detennioation of the inteipretation of the bluff impact zone. Ayes 4, nays 3. <br />Rowlette was opposed to tabling the j^)plication because she felt the Planning Commission did <br />not effectively do its job by not bringing the bluff issue to Mr< l^mmeiman s attention at the <br />beginning of his application. She felt a decision should be made according to what would be <br />reasonable for this lot and then consider how future bhiff issues should be handled. Peterson <br />and Berg agreed with Rowlette. <br />Schroeder yskH f ^merman how the delay of 30 days would affect him. Lemmeiman <br />rfspondfd ***** it would not huit hh** but questioned if it would be a buildable lot and where he <br />should go from this point. Lemmerman stated be has already spent a lot of money for this <br />approval. Schroeder replied that, technically, they could not say the lot would be buUdable. <br />(#8) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE <br />Rowlette reported that Council tabled the Tandem Properties application at their March 14 <br />meeting. There was much discussion about drainage issues a^ Council felt the Planning <br />r^tntMion had done a good job in addressing the drainage issue. The fiM that the bike trail <br />must be lor****^ 30* In was never brought up at Planning Commission meetings, even with Park <br />Commission representatives present, which affects two lots. The bike path was not drawn on <br />any r**"« Planning Commission members thought the trail would be in the road right-of-way <br />for Old Crystal Bay Road. Mabusth noted that an on-site meeting had been scheduled for 5:00 <br />p.m. March 21, 1994 and the bike trail issues would be resolved. Hurr did not approve of the <br />cul-de-sacs because they did not meet code and roads should have been connected where <br />possible. <br />(#9) OTHER ISSUES <br />Srhrrmf*T tepoiied that the joim Council/Planning Commission work session was very <br />productive with much discussion regarding the B-2 zone. <br />Meetings need to be scheduled to discuss the B-2 zone and amendment to the bluff impact zone <br />ordinance. Members preferred a 5:00 p.m. meeting and Gaffeon is to schedule.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.