Laserfiche WebLink
a suitable building envelope. <br />-•a^t^t^ *k^ Dlsviniiwr f^f^ininiSSlOI <br />TU rLAnniu^'^ v.vT4v«^—— <br />Mabusth reviewed the staff report “^ “* of iS coverage he <br />Tun HiUman ^„ee the area of the upper _deck from 6' *-„„ HiUman was present and “^^^thrar^ Urn «PP*r <>«k from 6' * <br />requirements. <br />. • A if .h. .nnlicaot was wiUing to redesign the entiyway andChair Sehroeder inquired if the »PP“«“‘ “ ^ , * j because of the easement Hillman responded that he would comider it N^an sute^^^ ^ ^ <br />the setback variances were . setback he would be much more inclined <br />irsCrtTcrn^SiSr^rsT^^^^^^ <br />?,;:;%“:inT.ht ot^“m«orora«ess"r .hose properries and becoming a roadway in <br />the future.ine (uhuic. <br />Chair Sehroeder commented he felt that the entryway on the south side needed to be <br />Siu«d o;Xated so that it was at least 30- from the lot line.reoucea or rciocaic« -------- <br />Lindquist moved to recommend approval of #1912 for ^ck would be <br />side yard setback requirements because the easement may someua, <br />residential development.I ----------------I <br />resubmit plans that conform to directives of **** best action was to <br />Ste’thTre^S^'w'^ot'X"awUcam"o“splore possible revisions to the plans. <br />........................ w •_______- ' <br />„ was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Rowlette, to ‘able #1912 V,^* ^^^J^nays <br />H^an at 400 Uaf Street, to aUow the applicant to redesign the proposal. Aye <br />0. <br />I <br />J