My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-23-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:58:22 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:54:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLLTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL <br />NO. ^415 <br />4. <br />5. <br />8 <br />All lots meet the standards of the RR-IB Zoning District. <br />All twenty-five lots have been found to have adequate and suiuble soils for on <br />site septic treatment facilities. <br />A private road shall serve all ten lots within the first phase division of the Coffin <br />property. The curb cut for the private road has been approved by the City <br />Engineer finding tl.ere is adequate siting distance for egress and <br />m p h. road. Countryside Drive shall be planed as a through road and dediwted <br />to die public. There shall be a temporary cul-de-sac installed to the east side ^ <br />Countrvside Drive West. The road, as it remains a cul-de-sac be <br />maintained by private property owners. No additional curb cuts will be allowed <br />from these properties. <br />The Citv has determined that an e.xtension outlot for the private road in the first <br />phase division of the Coffin property was not necessarv'. <br />The City has approved the planing of backlots within the ten lot division of the <br />Coffm property based on the following findings; <br />Applicant is able to meet 150% of the area and setback standards required <br />for backlots. <br />The alternative of providing access to an extended road corridor or loop <br />road would have the follow'ing negative impacts. <br />• Loss of mature trees providing screening for existing development <br />to w-est and maintaining natural amenities for fumre residential <br />development of surrounding area. <br />. Road extension or a loop road configuration would negate several <br />septic test areas where property is severely limited by steep slopes <br />and gentle sloped areas for the installation of mounds. <br />• Potential impact on existing drainageway that drains to the west to <br />Cygnet Place. <br />a. <br />b. <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />hrrnym
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.