Laserfiche WebLink
U • 99m%c9i <br />tcwvf*. C qwcaam <br />Miami . ri.e»i»A <br />T«w »•« <br />Wa«nt»«re«i. 0 C. <br />Ti.. toa •«! <br />POPHAM HAIK <br />• CMM000ICM ft RAUrWAKI, k. T ft • <br />ftUlTC 3JOO <br />122 SOUTM NIMTM STMVtT <br />MiMMCAPOkia. MiNMtaOTA 554Q2 <br />TCI. ftf t-333-4ftOO <br />FAX ftl2 334 0000 <br />KKVm ftTAUMTOM, Kftft. <br />OlftftCT D ial (ftll) ftftft-fttta <br />March 15. 1994 <br />ttv 011 •• AA 1 AS I AA2A <br />• ▼wTtAAAT. A«AMA««« <br />T«w At tAA-vi I'taaca <br />■MAR' 1 e '1991 <br />Ms. Jeanne Mabusth <br />Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />2750 Kelley Parkway <br />POBox66 <br />Crystal Bay MN 55323 <br />Re: Whitman Conditional Use Permit Application <br />I ■•nSL^ <br />Dear Jeanne: <br />Enclosed please find a March 9,1994 letter from Dan Ryerson and an enclosed Order <br />from the Hennepin County District Court in the matter of Whitman v. Lawrence. <br />enclosed please find a copy of my September 28, 1993 letter to Mr. Ryerson regarding this <br />matter. <br />As you may recall, Mr. Whitman had applied for a Conditional Use Permit to <br />undertake certain work on Tract E of RLS #1418. As 1 stated in my letter, the Whitmans do <br />not own Tract E but have an easement over it Pursuant to routine City policy, we do not <br />accept applications of this nature without permission from the fee owner of the property on <br />which the work is to be performed. Consequently, I advised Mr. Whitman’s attorney, Mr. <br />Ryerson, in my September 28. 1993 letter that, absent expressed permission from the <br />Lawrences, we would need a Court Order indicating that the Whitmans had the authority to <br />do the work that is the subject of the Conditional Use application (assuming, of course, that <br />they were to receive a Conditional Use permit). <br />2l9/2203$5imSA4