My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:37:49 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:32:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Jcanii.' j4abusth <br />Mardi 15, 1904 <br />Pase2 <br />Tte Ifcooepin County District Court has now ruled on Mr. Whitman ’s Summary <br />Judgment Motion. Specifically, paragraph 3 of the Court’s Or^r pr^vi^ 'ttot tte caseincnl <br />permits tte construction and extension of roadway across Tract E. RLS No. 1418, to <br />‘served subdivided lots within Tract A. RLS No. 141S.” In addition, please note th^on page <br />5 of the Memorandum in support of tte Order, tte Court outlines tte dilemma tte \^Jitraan $ <br />find themselves in. noting that tte Whitmans had brought this action and moved for Summary <br />Judgment because "tte City had refused to consider [tteirl application without <br />consent of [the Lawrences]." Finally, on page 8 of the Memorandum in support of the (Xdcr. <br />tte Court states: <br />After reviewing the parties ’ contentions, the Court concludes that <br />tte scope of tte particular easement, as contemplated by the <br />express language of tte 1976 deed and by the 1978 easement <br />agreement, is without restrictions as to the geographic location of <br />tte easement over Tract E. There is no limiting legal description <br />of tte easement, nor is there any otter limiting definition of the <br />easement ’s location otter than tte tract of land originally platted <br />as a roadway and demarcated as Tract E. Accordingly, from tte <br />face of tte warranty deed and from the 1978 casement <br />agr eement, the whole of Tract E is subject to an casement for <br />driveway purposes, access to County Road 6, and for utilities. <br />ConsequenUy. the Court concluded that tte Whitmans "may extend tte current roadway over <br />Tract E to serve subdivided lots contained in tte northern portion of Tract A. Slip. Op. at <br />12. <br />Now that the Whitmans ’ have obtained tte judicial interpretation of tte casement that <br />we requested in my September 28, 1993 letter, it is unnecessary for you to obtain permission <br />from the Lawrence ’s prior to accepting the Conditional Use Permit <br />Please feel free to contact me if you have anv questions <br />vis P. Staunton <br />enclosures <br />cc: Ronald Moorse <br />TJBarrett <br />219/220395113/15/94
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.