Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Couik O Action continued <br />page 3 of 10 <br />March 11. 1994 <br />Zoning File #1901 <br />conservation areas were not designated by the City within this property. Applicant proposes <br />1.% acres of retention treatment areas for surface water detention and treatment. Total dry = <br />36.29 acres (note this area does not include wetland Types 1 and 2 not iiKludcd in conservation <br />maps of City nor does this area include mitigation wetland areas). <br />Coffin site 10 lots, total acreage = 26.79 acres exclusive of road outlet. Total dry = 22.52 <br />acres. Designated wetland and retention and retention areas = 4.27 acres. <br />Brief Review of Subdivision <br />The proposed road within the Dickey parcel will be platted as a through road to Old Crystal Bay <br />Road and designated as a public road, refer to Exhibit I. At the time of the platting of <br />Countryside Manor, Country side Drive was designated a public road and the City was to take <br />over maintenance at the time the road was a through road. Review Exhibit U, land owners <br />within the Countryside Manor plat have petitioned to keep cul-de-sac road. Planning <br />Commission concurred with residents and recommends that extension road from Old Crystal Bay <br />Road be cul-de-sac but platted as a through road. At the time the City wishes to connect the <br />roads, the City would install connection link and take over maintenance. As approved by <br />Planning Commission, the road will continue to be maintained by private property owners. The <br />road outlot on the Coffin property is a private cul-de-sac road and approximately 1,250 lineal <br />ft. in length. Extension outlots have not been proposed to the west or north. Planning <br />Commission approved the layout of roads on the Coffin property and accepted the hardships <br />noted by applicant in the addendum to application. Exhibit B. <br />Review Exhibit F, at the November 8, 1993 meeting of the Council. Council advised that Types <br />1, 2, 7 and 8 wetlands not designed on the City’s conservation area maps must be dealt with by <br />other governing agencies before City would take official action on an application. The City <br />would not amend its ordinances nor conservation area maps as a result of the new classification <br />of wetlands. If an application involves the filling of these undesignated areas, the mitigation <br />issues would be dealt with by other appropriate agencies. Per Council ’s directive the <br />undesignated wetland areas would not be shown as drainage easements and these areas would <br />be credited against dry buildable. 75 ’ setback would not be required for septic drainfields from <br />a Type 1 wetland. The only areas to be designated with drainage easements would be the <br />designated wetlands as shown on Exhibit O and the retention areas required for surface water <br />ccntrol and treatment as shown on the preliminary plans (Exhibit Z). <br />The Park Commission has reviewed this application at several meetings. The 3 acre park outlot <br />shown on the Dickey property and referred to as the "Ancient Ones Park", is the only park area <br />requested by Commission. Park members asked the developer to designate interior park trails <br />but to keep them for private use. The Park Commission, Planning Commission and City