Laserfiche WebLink
1 1 <br />. a <br />i . <br />v» <br />■? • <br />V’-' * <br />1‘ - <br />A‘f/ . <br />V V <br />) <br />>* <br />if-. <br />* • <br />Zoning File 1296 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Exhibit I - <br />Exhibit J - <br />Exhibit K - <br />Exhibit L - <br />RLS-1216 Tracts B, C, D & E (0009, 0010, 0011, ( 0012) <br />Legal Decription of RLS~1216 <br />Highway Easement <br />Plans of Lots Discussed in Lot Area Table <br />History of the Properties <br />All seven parcels within RLS-1216 have been under the ownership of Miriam <br />and Ewald H. Gustafson for many years. It is staffs understanding that <br />Miriam Gustafson is a member of the original Coffee family that owned the <br />majority of the properties within the area. In fact, prior to their recent <br />move to Excelsior, the Gustafsons lived across the street at 1890 Shadywood <br />Road. Staff remembers meeting with Mr. Gustafson a few years back to <br />discuss what potential the property had in its present configuation. This <br />would mean consideration of all seven lots combined as one unit. It should <br />be noted that these lots were never legally combined, but remained single <br />separate lots of record. It was staff's recommendation to file for the lot <br />area variance as it appeared that parcel 0003 would have the greatest lot <br />depth but without the necessary updated survey locating the present water <br />line and county right-of-way it was difficult to give direction. At that <br />time staff had no knowledge that Mr. Tillotsen's residence and driveway <br />intersected the subject parcel, review Exhibit E. In fact, Mr. Tillotsen's <br />dock is located on Tract F, the same tract that applicants have installed <br />dock. Review Exhibit I. The applicants have advised that it is their <br />understanding that Mr. Gustafson has some kind of arrangement with Mr. <br />Til lot sen to sell the encroached parcel to him at some time in the future. <br />Without the "OOOa* property, the property is clearly not a buildable lot, <br />review staff sketch Exhibit H. There isnobuilding envelope and if the lot <br />was deemed buildable, it would require the granting of multiple, excessive <br />variances to all lakeshore ordinances. <br />It is clearly not the intent or wishes of the present applicants to apply <br />for the lot area variance. The recent county road acquisitions have placed <br />even more restrictions on the building envelope. Planning Commission <br />members will note the stakes of the additional right-of-way in relation to <br />the subject property. <br />Staff has advised the applicant that in order to make any decision on an <br />accessory structure or use of the property that the bulldability of the lot <br />must be resolved by the City. <br />Please review the table listed below of recent lot area variances dealing <br />with lakeshore properties similar to this one. <br />*t t • <br />* • ^ <br />» • <br />n-- ■ <br />< • <br />*