Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />u * <br />■ \ <br />w •« mm mm m mm. mm <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Property ^rea <br />Restoration <br />On Building <br />Envelope <br />Lakeshore/ <br />Non-Lakeshore <br />Existing <br />Structures <br />Approved/ <br />Denied_ <br />LaBresh - <br />Appl. «999 <br />S«300 s.f. <br />LR-IC <br />21,780 S.f. <br />required <br />Narrov lot depth, <br />excessive lakeshore <br />and vetland setbacks, <br />with county road right- <br />of-way increased next <br />to bridge. <br />Lakeshore Cabin (has bldg) <br />assessed for sewer <br />and water but not <br />connected• Total <br />replacement. <br />Denied <br />6-23-86 <br />Pemberton - <br />Appl. #983 <br />1^* <br />11,130 *.f. <br />LR-IC <br />21.7,0 a.f. <br />requir.<) <br />Harrow lot depth. <br />75* lakchor. setback <br />on both east and west. <br />Lakeshore Existing residence <br />hooked to SM»er. <br />Total replaceawnt. <br />Approved <br />1-13-M <br />Beintz 8,300 s.f. <br />LR-IB <br />43.5,0 s.f. <br />required <br />Harrow lot depth with Lakeshore <br />total of 100'- multiple, <br />excessive variances required <br />for residence. <br />Undeveloped. Hot <br />assessed for sewer <br />Haver assessed as <br />buildabl. lot based <br />on market valuation. <br />Denied <br />3-16-78 <br />Subject <br />Property <br />5,500 S.f. <br />IB-IC <br />21,780 s.f. <br />required <br />\ • <br />*•» V ' <br />fi'. r ■’ yr * <br />Harrow depth of <br />buildinq envelope - <br />multiple variances required <br />to construct residence - <br />major portions of property <br />consist of wetlands. <br />Lakeshore Undeveloped. Hot <br />assessed for sewer <br />and water. Hever <br />asseesed as buildabl. <br />lot based on market <br />valuation. <br />). <br />♦. « <br />In additioDr staff has reviewed the assessed Ptu«.ket valuations for all <br />seven parcels, they have been listed for your consideration belowi <br />» <br />8 <br />IParoel •88 •87 •86 •85 •84 •83 •82 •81 •80 •19 •78 <br />1 . <br />0003 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 550.00 500.00 440.00 360.00 330.00 300.00 <br />0009 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 100.00 60.00 40.00 30.00 50.00 <br />> • *0010 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 30.00 <br />- <br />0011 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 40.CO 30.00 50.00 <br />• <br />0012 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 50.00 40.00 40.00 <br />• % <br />0013 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 100.00 60.00 40.00 30.00 50.00 <br />0014 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 270.00 250.00 140.00 100.00 80.00 70.00 <br />r y. <br />tr' <br />■4 <br />& <br />The parcels have never been assessed as buildable lots. Parcel 0003 has <br />been assessed for lateral sewer and a water unit, but the subject parcels <br />have never been assessed for sewer or water (0013 and 0014). <br />Staff RecoHBcndation <br />To recommend denial of the lot area variance application of Merritt <br />Peterson and Riclc Stodola based on the following findingst <br />1. There is only approximately 5,500 s.f. of area within the defined <br />building envelope with an average approximate depth of 100*. <br />2. There is not an adaquate area to build a house and meet the 75* <br />setbac)c requirement, the front, rear and side yard setbacks and <br />hardcover regulations. <br />3. The property has never been assessed for sewer or water. <br />4. The property has been valuated for tax purposes in the past at a <br />reduced amount to reflect the fact that these are substandard lots and <br />not appropriate for residential construction. <br />5. The lot is subject to flooding and is in the natural drainageway <br />to the lake for the surrounding watershed. There is no way to build <br />on the property without diverting the surface water run-off in a <br />manner contrary to the normal run-off pattern and onto the adjacent <br />street. Any construction would be subject to periodic flooding. <br />I <br />■^r <br />v: e <br />f