Laserfiche WebLink
w^ • <br />!#• ^ <br />f <br />I <br />I t • t ^ • <br />!•« '-AfM .-<*4*‘f ■ IVf If,/ <br />ISST"t*!:*»*^^ *JlL?J£l«J*.!!SrM tS!^BMttcry to Mot tho 2-aero dry bulldablo roqulrofcoat dhwXd tlio <br />17* rlfht-of-oay croato a daflclt. Metien* Ayaa»5» Raya 0# <br />*V • <br />C\‘‘ <br />■otioa yaaaod.I l <br />•md <br />9249 <br />r. Rttxven V <br />. ;■ ♦•* - <br />nmoo. eORDITTORAL PDLMIT <br />• i V- * <br />• a' ' <br />Chalraan Kallay atatod that tha applicant ra^attad tabli|^ <br />thia aattar bacauia pertonnal froo Park Construction wara unabla <br />to^attand. toning Adminlttrator Mabuath conflnaad that and addad <br />that all concarnad parties would attand tha Octobai 3# 19M <br />Planning Commission Haating. <br />•1311 80AO B. ASABAJRI <br />1745 POZ SntBRT <br />VJUUAIICBS <br />OOHTIHOATIOR OP POBLIC HRAIllRQ <br />Applicant waa pratent for this matter. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabuath explained that this oattar <br />involved a height variance for a Y^f <br />of tha wall Is 8-1/2 fast where 3-1/2 feat Is <br />allowad. Tha wall creates no sight distance problems. Chairman <br />liIJiJ jacta*d ^haVlt^'IaV for \he purpose of <br />applicant stated that a 3-1/2’ fence would not work as wall, and <br />tha fence was already nearly completed. <br />nothing to curtail traffic. A 8-1/2* fence seamed more <br />Intimidating. <br />It was moved by Planning Commission member Hanson, seconded <br />by Planning Commission member Bellows, to recommend approval of <br />11318. Motion, Ayes-5, Nayc-0, Motion passed. <br />#1319 KAREH PULLBR <br />4055 BLM 8TRSBT <br />RBMBWAL VARIANCB <br />CORTIHOATIOR OP POBLIC BBARINGTha applicant waa not present for this matter. <br />It waa moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />.1 - "T: ‘ <br />-.a