10-18-1993 Planning PacketC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" •• ■ - ■ irr - ♦* 7;;* '■% Rmmi or td njuanw cqmumiob 19« 19M FILBD* 91301**OTim COHTXWnD the city eottld r«9ul«t« dcvvlepMiit of tho outlet. PynnlM CoMltoion oMbor Cohon •xproiiod hli profomM of otoff** roeoiMiondotloni •• oppeuod to "Option B . KnllJJ nnkod Mr. Mbit# ohnt bln proforonen would bo. Mr. Mblto Indleatod tbnt bo bod no objoctlon to tho torao oot forth in "Option A", Boklnf tbo lorfo let on outlet. Xt woo oovod by Plonnlno CoMloolen o«obor Cohon* to f0COBs#nd •pprovftl of ^tils opp 1 Icot^lofi# por rocomnendotlono ond condltlono of approval which Includod the terso of "Option A" rather than "Option B". Upon further review of ataff'a reconwendatlona and condltlono* Cohen queotloned caraoraph 2 concernlno a 1^* right“of"way ter County Road If. Cohen withdrew hla notion until thla wao explained thla would allow a conalatency with the Clty’o 100 rloht-of-way corridor for the McCully Road connection between County Roada 19 and 6. Bel Iowa aaked how the right-of-way would affect the applicant's dry buildaole* Caffron atatad that It night have an effect. Kelley asked about setbacks tanka. Caffron stated that the 17' right-of-way would still ^2.low for the required 50* setback for the exletlnc house. There should be no Interference with the septic tanks locatsd on the property. Kelley asked if the northerly lot line could be mved enough to offset the 17' right-of-way should It create a deficit in the required dry bulldable? Caffron answered affirmatively. Caffron clarified for Mr. white what the City would ne^ to do In light of the 17' right-of-way. Applicant questioned how that would affect the 150' corridor and the possibility of turning that Into a lot In the future. It was his undsrstsndlng that 150' was the maximum. Caffron replied that there was actually a 200' standard for the District, and noted that the width of that corridor necessarily decreases as the 2 Acre requirements for Lot 1 is satisfied. There would be no other alternatives If applicant wished to obtain the 2-acre dry bulldable requirement where the house Is now located. Bellows added that the wetland does not extend to the property line so there would be no way to make it contiguous going the other way. Cohen aaked why the City was considering the County's re<; the 17'. Caffron stated that normally tho City denies any Klght- of"»vay roQuoats for County roada that ara not haavlly travollade Due to the fact that the City has a 100' corridor to the north, and because the road Is a major connecting point for Highway 12 and Mound, the City Staff felt It would be appropriate to grant tho right-of-way. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of application #1301# par ataff racoiwnandatlona condltlona. The Planning Commlaalon racomnandad Option A becauaa it would be a planning mode alnce future davc.^opmant in that area haa not yet been determined. Paragraph 6 would be omltued entirely at thla time. Thla approval would alao ba baaed f