My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 3:56:21 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 3:47:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To:Planning Commissicn Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Proa: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning ( Zoning Administrator <br />Date September 15, 1988 <br />Subject #1301 Fredrick White, 180 North Shore Drive West - <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review - Continuation of <br />Public Hearing <br />Application - The applicant has revised his request to exclude the second <br />building lot from consideration at this time, and has revised the lot <br />lines for the parcel to contain the existing houie. <br />Zoning District ~ RR-IB <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Notice of Plannir.g Commission Action 7/21/88 <br />Glenn Cook's Letter of 7/15/88 <br />Hennepin County Department of Transportation’s Letter <br />7/27/88 <br />Staff's Sketch of Potential Access Locations <br />Conceptual Area Development Plan Based on Feasible <br />Access Locations <br />Memo i Exhibits 7/14/88 <br />Revised Preliminary Plat Drawing <br />Planning Commission Minutes of 7/18/88 <br />Discussion - <br />The applicant has revised his proposal, as noted above, to include <br />creation of just a separate 2+ acre lot to contain the existing house. The <br />remaining parcel could then be designated as either a second lot or as an <br />outlot. Note that designation as an outlot would be appropriate if the <br />City's intent is to not allow a separate house to be constructed on the <br />large parcel without further subdivision. The reverse option, to make the <br />large parcel Lot 2, would allow a single residence to be built without an <br />additional subdivision, and would have potential significant effect on how <br />a future subdivision might occur. <br />The applicant states that his intent is to complete this initial one- <br />lot subdivision now, then perhaps come back later with a proposal to divide <br />off a second lot. Applicant notes that he has interested parties looking <br />at the large parcel for possible development. <br />• t laiiiit imiti’TTT'— nii-rir ■■ rAr—«
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.