05-17-1993 Planning PacketC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

S‘ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1820 - CONT Mabusth explained The County proposes the replacement of an existing wooden seawall with steel. She noted the permit has been issued and the repairs have been completed. The County was unaware that a new conditional use permit would be required and thought any repairs would fall under the previously approved conditional use permit. She pointed out the major issue with this application is the question of storm water management affecting the quality of run-off to the lake from the parking lot. She noted the City would like to see something in place prior to the 1994 boating season and referred to three options recommended by the City Engineer. The County is agreeable and staff will work with them to determine which option is most viable. She suggested the Watershed District should also be asked to covenant. Nolan suggested approval be conditioned upon on-going maintenance of the area. Mabusth explained that is currently being done by the County. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1820 for Hennepin County Department of Environmental Management, North Arm Access, approving a conditional use permit and variance for the repair of an existing seawall, per staff’s recommendation. Ayes 7, nays 0. (#4) #1822 MARK PRUETER, 3215 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:11 - 7:34 P.M. Tne Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Prueter were present for this application. Mabusth explained the applicants request side setback, and hardcover variance for an addition to the rear of the existing residence, and an average lakeshore setback variance to allow replacement of an existing lakeshore deck proposed at 18x10.6’. The deck area will be reduced. Mr. Prueter stated they hope to make this their permanent residence, but need more living space for future family additions. He pointed out the lot narrows at the rear and the house was constructed prior to adoption of the current zoning ordinances. There is no additional land available on either side and the neighbors do not object to the project. He testified that the walkway from the house to the garage is necessary because of ponding in this area, and he hopes to address this issue. i