My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
05-17-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2023 4:15:19 PM
Creation date
10/26/2023 4:11:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
■/ <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 17, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1825 - CONT. <br />Paul Anderson, 2530 Old Beach Road, questioned why the Commission <br />was considering ways to interpret the code to allow the division <br />when they should be concentrating on why the proposal is necessary. <br />He felt this vrou I d be a detriment to the neighborhood. Ha said <br />construction of another residence along the drive would be make <br />passage on the road difficult and create an unsafe condition. <br />Chair Schroeder answered they are not trying to find a way to <br />approve the division, but if this is a legitimate request they must <br />consider all the facts. <br />Peterson noted because the neighbors all have 2+ acres does not <br />mean that this property must maintain that acreage. <br />Saklad felt the division would be detrimental to the environment <br />and create an unsafe condition. <br />Rowlette stated they must concentrate on the pertinent issues, and <br />added just because they do not want a development does not mean <br />they can deny it if It mee«s aii rules and regulations. <br />Smoot noted then unless the rules change, they car>not approve the <br />division. <br />Saklad questioned the hardcover issue. <br />Mabusth explained that if approved, the appiicant would be required <br />to remove much of the hardcover on the developed lot and would not <br />be able to keep improvements on the lot as it exists now. <br />McCarthy stated some of the required removals are not necessary <br />I terns. <br />It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Chair Schroeder, to recommend <br />denial of Application #182 for Thomas L. McCarthy, 2490 Old Beach <br />Road, based on the lack of hardship and the application setting a <br />negative precedent. Ayes 7, nays 0. <br />Chair Schroeder called for a recess from 8:50 to 8:58 p.m. <br />(#3) #1820 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, <br />NORTH ARM ACCESS - CONDITIONAL USE PF.RMIT/VARIANCE - <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:10 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />W«s. irv.^r—
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.