My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
05-17-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2023 4:15:19 PM
Creation date
10/26/2023 4:11:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 17, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1826 - CONT. <br />Mr. Hensor. questioned the brick walkway on the side of the house <br />and the area that is calculated as hardcover. <br />Mabusth explained an overhang is considered hardcover if it exceeds <br />1 1/2’, so 3’ of the appiicants’ 4 1/2’ overhang area is calculated <br />as hardcover. If the brick were removed underneath the overhang, <br />hardcover would be based on 3’ of overhang area. <br />Henson said he would be willing to remove this area if that would <br />make a difference. <br />Rowlette said this will be added to the record and forwarded on to <br />the CouncI I. <br />(#8) #1827 RICHARD HENRY NELSON, <br />3908 CHERRY AVENUE - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:54 - 10:10 P.M. <br />The AffidavIt of Publication and Certificate of MaiIing were noted. <br />Mr. Nelson and Don Bonnicksen, the builder, were present. <br />Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a new roof extending <br />beyond the existing building envelope over the residence which is <br />located within the average lakeshore setback area and the 0-75’ <br />zone. She clarified that the roof will extend beyond the footprint <br />of the house over a small section of existing deck on the lake side <br />and a new deck to the rear of the house. The applicant proposes no <br />hardcover removals. <br />Nelson clarified that the purpose for the project is to get a deck <br />to the rear of the property because run-off has caused structural <br />damage to the home. Currently the roof has three peaks and the back <br />of the property is terraced downward to the house. He said he wants <br />to pul I the house together architectural ly. He noted he was u»)aware <br />that he should consider removals of existing hardcover and said he <br />would be glad to remove the plastic under the rock landscape area. <br />Mabusth questioned whether he would be grading away from the back <br />of the house. <br />Nelson clarified he intends to dig a small trench and install <br />drainage tile to run to the drive. <br />Smith questioned his neighbors’ response. <br />Nelson said those he talked to are in support of the project.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.